Aldermen to Review Mayor Dolan's Proposed Pay Raise

The Melrose Appropriations Committee passed a motion on Mayor Rob Dolan's request for a 26 percent raise during their meeting Monday night at City Hall. The Board of Aldermen will review the order on Monday, Feb. 4.

Updated at 3 p.m. Tuesday:

The Melrose Appropriations Committee passed a motion on Mayor Rob Dolan's request for a 26 percent pay raise during their meeting Monday night at City Hall.

If approved by the aldermen at their meeting on Monday, Feb. 4, Dolan, who currently earns a salary of $99,896, will see his annual pay increase to $125,000 starting in January 2014.

After hearing from nearly two dozen Melrosians—nearly all of whom supported Dolan's proposed pay raise—and then deliberating the merits of the proposal, the committee passed the motion 8-3. Committee Chairman Donald Conn, Jr. and members Jaclyn Bird and Monica Medeiros opposed Dolan's proposal.

In a Dec. 26 letter to the Melrose Board of Aldermen, Dolan requested a pay increase from $99,896 to $125,000. In a Jan. 15 letter to Aldermen, the mayor wrote, "I respectfully request that this Honorable Board amend Melrose Revised Ordinances, Chapter 48-1. Mayor. Part A. Salary, to read as follows: Effective January 1, 2014, the salary for the position of Mayor shall be $125,000 per annum."

Residents Tackle Mayor's Raise

The Aldermanic Chamber was filled to capacity, largely with Melrosians in favor of the mayoral salary increase proposed by Dolan. While several residents raised the issue of there needing to be parity and equitable pay for the mayor of Melrose, the majority tended to focus on Dolan's performance as the chief executive of the city.

Resident Patricia Faro, speaking for the first time at a City Hall session, praised Dolan for his fiscally responsible approach to running the city, building sports facilities and his commitment to education, to name a few things. Faro added how she always tells people to move to Melrose because "we have the best mayor" and losing him to Boston or Washington would be a great loss to the community.

Melrosian Suzy Groden said Dolan has worked tirelessly for the past decade and to refuse him the pay raise would reflect poorly on the community. 

While the majority of residents backed the pay raise either for Dolan's achievements or the fact that Melrose ranks near the bottom in overall compensation based on recent data compiled by the city's Human Resources Department, there were a few locals who opposed the proposal.

Melrosian Devan Manchester spoke to Dolan's "proven track record of 12 years" and "has been working hard and doing a fantastic job" but the city "simply can't afford it right now."

Resident Ted Kennedy concurred with the points raised by Manchester, adding that if he were to ask his boss for a 25 cent raise he'd say "there's the door," and for Dolan to request a 26 percent raise is "almost an insult to all of us."

Board Deliberation

Committee member Ronald Seaboyer discussed the overwhelming support people showed, both in person during the meeting and via email, for Dolan, saying, "I can't help but support this (proposed raise)." 

Committee member Gail Infurna said the mayor should not be making a salary that is less than 14 department heads that report directly to him. Meanwhile, fellow committee member Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis gave an emotional backing of Dolan for going above and beyond the call of duty by helping flood victims in the early morning hours during past storms.

Bird provided an explanation as to why she couldn't support the mayor's raise. 

"...Despite all the personal testimony tonight that was extremely personal in nature...this is not a personal issue; this is a personnel issue," Bird said. "...It's simply not the role of the Board of Aldermen, a legislative body, to give out a 26 percent raise to an elected incumbent who has more than two years left in his term. This is not the appropriate way to address this issue and this is not following the right process."

Small incremental raises over the next two years or a larger raise following the 2016 election would have been more appropriate ways to handle the issue, according to Bird, and since neither were considered she voted against the proposed raise.

Meanwhile, Medeiros explained that she wanted to discuss the city's mayoral compensation in greater detail in more than just one committee meeting to arrive at an equitable solution.

Conn said he considered some of the arguments put forward by others, including one that the city should be ashamed of itself for paying its mayor a lower compensation than most other communities.

"I guess I'm out of step with everybody because the mayoral salary of $99,896 didn't make me ashamed or embarassed," Conn said. "...The last thing I ever expected was the mayoral salary to be set on a referendum on the proponents of Mayor Dolan. Mayor it is a testament to you that all these people support you. I'm not going to vote for $125,000 salary because I think it is too high, and I don't think it is too high having anything to do with you as a person or as the mayor."

Michael Dell Isola February 04, 2013 at 09:43 PM
We have a voice! No matter how personally reserved one is, they can always be “heard” on social media. No more does the schoolyard introvert feel left out, or the extroverted Citizen Joe/Jane, miss an opportunity to publicly speak-up. All of us know that responding to comments on our favorite sites may eventually turn caustic because it gets personal. We certainly all have friends and family who no longer speak to each other because of misconstrued Face Book comments. Please do not to let the ease of responding openly on social media, especially, “The Patch”, define your character. Many of you, on both sides of the Mayor’s raise issue, who have posted quick opinions, are good people with kind hearts. To put vitriolic statements out there that are biting, inaccurate, and over-the-top about about our elected representatives and neighbors is corrosive. Un-retrievable gossip about our mayor, public representatives, city employees, school committee members, business people, fellow Melrosians, or anyone else, makes the entire community look bad.
Michael Dell Isola February 04, 2013 at 09:45 PM
It saddens me to read statements like: [she] “got the treatment”, “retribution from a bully mayor and his goons”, “this has turned into a terrible place to live”, “city officials who report to him have bullied and taken bribes from residents to avoid penalties and legal action”, and “tyrants are turned on by the most ardent supporters” Those statements are not Melrose, and I know you agree. We are living in a place with good people everywhere. It is unlikely that anyone abused by a public official or citizen group would be silent and wait for postings on the Melrose Patch to expose such allegations, serious allegations. Get positive! Put aside these ridiculous notions of government corruption and start talking about substance. All you experts can engage our elected representatives and contribute ideas, and skills, to improve our city. I would like to read in The Patch how residents from all walks-of-life continually come together to debate, create, and innovate, the Melrose experience.
Michael Dell Isola February 04, 2013 at 09:46 PM
Making this debate about Mr. Dolan’s personal compensation is very short sighted. If we desire a diverse city that is affordable, safe, and largely enjoyable for various styles of living, Melrose residents will need to think, speak, and act positively in order to attract talented CEO level executives interested in the job. Personally, my family is in favor of increasing the salary to pay for it. Most us pay more for unwatched cable and internet features than the increased tax contribution would be.
Michael Dell Isola February 04, 2013 at 09:46 PM
Here is a thought: Good citizens + caring neighbors + an engaged public = quality leadership Quality leadership + positive social interaction = positive public experience Positive public experience + innovative Chamber of Commerce = quality merchants Quality merchants + loyal customers = prosperous business Prosperous business + negotiated incentives = increased tax base Increased tax base + open minded tax payers + skilled workforce = quality city services Quality city services + involved parents + collaborative school board = top school administrators Top school administrators + committed volunteers = fortunate homebuyers Fortunate homebuyers + reinvestment in community = better property values Better property values + all of the above = optimum investment Optimum investment + responsible planning = a generation of happy retirees A generation of happy retirees = good citizens Repeat
Myron Dittmer February 04, 2013 at 10:55 PM
Thanks for your insight, Michael......I totally agree with your thinking. Anonymity can sometimes brings out the worse behavior in people.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »