patching...
Breaking: Flood Warning In Effect »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

SOUND OFF: Romney and the RNC

What did you think of Romney's speech and the convention? Will you vote for him in November?

 

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney accepted the Republican nomination for president of the United States Thursday night.

Romney gave a speech that included a more personal view of his life as well as focused on adding jobs, criticizing President Barack Obama’s policies, repealing Obamacare and promoting his business background. His messages will always ring true to the average Republican, but what about the all-important swing voters? 

"Finding a message that can persuade the small number of people in swing states to switch their vote away from Mr. Obama to Mr. Romney has so far proved to be elusive for Republicans," The Financial Times reported.

We want to hear from you: What did you think of the former governor’s speech? What did you think of the convention? Were you swayed in either direction after watching the proceedings from Tampa? From his experience as governor of the commonwealth, are you more apt or less apt to vote for Romney?

Let us know in the comment section below. 


  • Did the RNC swing your vote?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, the convention showed me why I should vote for Romney.
        34 (38%)
    • No, I'm still undecided
        4 (4%)
    • No, I already know who I'm voting for
        51 (57%)
    Total votes: 89
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Mitt Romney, RNC, and Swing Voters

Danielle Lizotte

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

The speech was short of specifics...lots of vague platitudes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roberta

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Definitely agree! What does Romney really stand for? He was a moderate republican is MA with an good health care plan. Now he opposes Obama care or affordable care, which is modeled from his MA health plan. He would take away Women's rights to chose and the worst part of this would be that if elected we would have a supreme court that will set us back 60 years at least.

Henry W Buswell

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

It will be difficult for Romney to win in traditionally Democrated voting Massachusetts, with large unions and many on some sort of government help. Scott Brown could win and that would be almost a Republican victory.

Reply

Mark Cain

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Frankly, you would have to be asleep to vote for Obammy. I would vote for a shoe before I voted for that bum. Romney is the man.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenni Speed

12:45 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Mark, I don't know you at all, but I hope that you are not the racist that your "Obammy" reference would indicate that you are.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:34 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

I believe you do vote for shoes, Mark Cain. And you are a sad , sexually confused bigot who thinks it's okay to vote for shoes. Keep up the good work.

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

WOW, David. That does not sound like the party of inclusion and tolerance talking. Mayor Mumbles, Lieawatha, Urkel, and Barry would be very upset with you if they heard such talk.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

4:50 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Chris L--You must have been formidable on the playground. Though not particularly original. And don't you worry about Mark Cain--he can take care of himself, and knows exactly what I'm talking about (and you would, too, if you paid attention--but a sense of fairness would also help you immensely). As for inclusiveness, I'm afraid I'm not like a lot of Democrats--I know where to draw the line.

Paula Leva

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

The whole RNC experience left me flat. We mainly heard assertions and falsehoods rather than facts.There was more talk about how Obama has failed us than what the Republican team of Romney and Ryan will actually do to create jobs and help get our economy back on the road to greater prosperity. One of the greatest problems in our government today is that policies are being determined by corporate interests whose money can influence what is done rather than what is in the best interest of the people. We are being distracted by discussions of issues such as women's rights, which should not even be on the table, instead of passing regulations and incentives for companies to bring jobs back to the US. Maybe people should start boycotting companies who try to sell products made anywhere but the US?

Reply

Ray Fellows

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Keeping all politics and ideology out of it, Mitt described to a tee the America I believe in.

Reply

Kristin

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Go Mitt 2012! Obama is bringing Ameeica way down! Romney is very experienced and a true leader!!

Reply

Kristin

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

There is no comparison between Obama/Biden and Mitt Romney/Ryan!
The republican ticket has true management/leadership experience and will definitely get us out of the turmoil, downward spiral that the Obama Administration has us in.
For your own good and the good of future Ameicans, you must Vote Mitt Romney in November!!

Reply

Kristin

9:43 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Americans*
Sorry small key board :)

Go Mitt!!!! 2012

Reply

Jim Gallagher

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

When I vote for Obama in November I will be voting for the candidate who has a better understanding of where I came from and what it has taken to get me here. I admire Mr Romney's family history - I just don't see a self made man - his "opportunities" were there already. I signed on for the hope and I'm not willing to quit now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I have to ask you, how can his better understand of where you came from assist him in turning the nation's economy around? Do you understand that 23 Million Americans are out of work or underemployed? Nobody is questioning Obama's likability factor - his job as President is to lead. Under his leadership, the economy has not improved in over three years' time!

Comment_arrow

Mark Farrell

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Jim, that is simply not true. Romney went to college as did many in his day. His father gave him money when he graduated and Mitt gave it to charity. Mitt Romney worked for everything he has today without his father's help.

Comment_arrow

Stephen Faris

7:44 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

A really bad analysis. I guess I wont bother you with facts.

Steve

Comment_arrow

Augie

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Everyone on the Titanic was also hopeful Jim. Enjoy your ride to the bottom.

Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Jim - glad to hear that you had all of your college paid for by others that worked. Also happy to hear that you have never worked a real job to get to where you are today. What kind of government job do you have? Did you take pay cuts or no raises during the tough economic times we are in or did you protest or strike to keep what you think is yours. Also, did you shower at least once a month during the Occupy Anything event in your neighborhood??!!

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

So Obama, just like Warren, got his opportunities because of who his parents were(economically and ethnically). Did you go to Harvard and Columbia?

Hmmm, yea...he's in touch with "the common man"....I'm not saying Romney is either, but put the kool aid down.

Shirley M Niro

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I am an independent voter who votes what the country needs. Have had enough of "Hope & Change". He tried & failed. We have an economic emergency. The country can do nothing for the social issues if we are broke! Who better to put our financial house in order? To whom would you go?

Reply

HyeAghcheg

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Obama was given an opportunity and he has not performed well, despite his efforts. He's a nice man, but we need more experience in the Oval Office. If we truly want this economy to be turned around, Romney must be elected in 2012. If the voters give Obama another term, the long term financial consequences to this country are going to be devastating.

Reply

Joseph

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

No question - no comparison between candidates! Obama has done nothing to help this country and will only lead to its demise.
Medicaid and SS is going to be insolvent very shortly. It needs to be fixed but the Dems don't want to do anything. Is it better to be contributing to this "fund" which is not even real, for it to be gone by the time you need it? It makes no sense not to try and reform it. Paul Ryan's budget got 48 yes votes and 51 no votes in the Senate. Obama's budget got 99 no votes. Who's the extreme one?
Vote Romney/Ryan 2012! Come on MA voters, you know it is the right Vote!
Pssst...no one will know ;)

Reply

Joseph

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

No question - no comparison between candidates! Obama has done nothing to help this country and will only lead to its demise.
Medicaid and SS is going to be insolvent very shortly. It needs to be fixed but the Dems don't want to do anything. Is it better to be contributing to this "fund" which is not even real, for it to be gone by the time you need it? It makes no sense not to try and reform it. Paul Ryan's budget got 48 yes votes and 51 no votes in the Senate. Obama's budget got 99 no votes. Who's the extreme one?
Vote Romney/Ryan 2012! Come on MA voters, you know it is the right Vote!
Pssst...no one will know your vote! Your friends will be voting for Mitt Also!!
It's the right vote for America!

Reply

Ed Burdick

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I have never had a problem with Mitt as a person, and back in his moderate days, I was not that far left of his politics. But the hard swing to the right of both Mitt and the whole GOP keeps me solidly in the democrat column. The slaughter of the truth in the speeches was a wonder to behold. I have a lot of disappointment in how things have gone since 2008, and Obama shares some of the blame, but conspiring as they have to make him fail at any cost is a new low.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max Walker

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Janice why do you think the Democrats have swung hard to the left. Is bailing out banks and the largest insurance company a swing to the left? Is waging war in Afghanistan to destroy the roots of the 9/11 attacks instead of messing around in Iraq a place we had no business with, a swing to the left? Is making sure that Bin Laden is no more a threat to the world a swing to the left? Is enacting healthcare legislation, the basic ideas for which came from the Heritage Foundation, one of the most rightwing thinktanks in the country, a swing to the left? Is embracing the vast majority of the prior administration's policies on terrorism, a swing to the left? Which is it?

Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

So it appears you believe our economy can be repaired based on social issues?

Comment_arrow

jhschool

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Ed, I agree with you 100%.

Max Walker

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I was looking for how much Mitt Romney agrees with his running mate's budget plan. I got none of it. I hope he doesn't obfuscate on the specifics of that question for the rest of the campaign season and we get some pointed answers. And I sure hope the media and the debate moderators hold his feet to the fire on that specific question.

In particular, I want to know if Mitt Romney agrees with Paul Ryan's idea of means-testing future social security and medicare beneficiaries. Means-testing punishes the conservative virtue of frugality and the idea of saving for a rainy day. It flies in the face of everything the Republicans say they stand for, and in particular stands in sharp contrast to the philosophy of Ayn Rand who Paul Ryan has said he admires.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Mitt Romney is at the top of the ticket, not Paul Ryan. Romney has far more experience in financial analysis and strategic planning for the maximization of positive financial results. Am sure he'll consult with Ryan, but when push comes to shove, Romney will be designing the final plan. He did it here in MA and hopefully, he'll get the chance to do it for the nation.

Comment_arrow

Max Walker

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

HyeAghcheg -- yes Romney is at the top of the ticket and I hope he makes clear his plans for ss and medicare. Right now, not having heard from him, we can only glean what we can from articles about his writing.

Forbes, no left-leaning magazine has said that he is for means-testing (http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/11/05/mitt-romneys-vaguely-promising-plan-for-entitlement-reform/). This is a very socialist idea and I wonder why the Republicans are the ones who talk about it.

Comment_arrow

Max Walker

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Romney clearly buys into means-testing for social security benefits of younger folks. No question about it. Watch this speech he delivered to the Americans for Prosperity Foundation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vaVWUgqcrk&feature=player_embedded#!). The part where he talks about SS reform begins at circa 20:00 minutes. What I don't understand is why seniors are allowed to take full benefits that they are due, but why he is so ready to screw younger workers like me (in our 40s). Why not means-test current seniors drawing benefits? A rich guy is a rich whether he is old now or when he is old in the future.

Craig

10:20 am on Saturday, September 1, 2012

As an independent, undecided baby boomer that voted for Obama last time, I felt the Republicans did a good job at the RNC of continuing the storyline of change. The RNC did nothing for me in terms of swaying my vote one way or the other.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

If you're pleased with Obama's track record, by all means, vote for him again.

Al L

12:45 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

It's really simple. If you're rich vote for Romney, if you're not rich vote for Obama. The republicans need Romney to get in , that's why Trump has been supporting him , so they can protect their money. If Obama gets in, the rich will start paying their fair share in taxes. It's not about jobs as the Repubs. lead you to believe...it's about protecting their money so they can avoid paying their far share of taxes. They want to stiff the middle class . Obama wants to help the middle class and wants the upper class to pay their fair share. What's wrong with that?

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Really? Apparently, you've fallen for the Democratic brainwashing. The wealthy have sufficient funds to live off of; the economy has little impact on their lifestyle either way. The lower and middle classes are the folks in need of jobs, so they can provide for their families. Do you honestly believe Obama has succeeded in creating a financial environment, which encouraged a rapid recovery? The presidency is not supposed to be a popularity contest; it's designed to select the best leader for the country. In case you haven't noticed, millions of people that are not rich have suffered dearly under Obama's administration. Do you honestly think they would fare worse under Romney, because he's a wealthy man?

Comment_arrow

dwilliams

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Wealth has nothing to do with it; it is a simple matter of Economics. Get the economy moving (via lowering taxes), profits increase and therefore tax revenue increases. I am not a believer in wealth redistribution; if I earned it, I want to spend it.

And let me think, Obumer has really helped the Middle Class in his first 4 years hasn't he? Let's tax them some more with Obamacare. You CANNOT tax society into prosperity!!!!!

Comment_arrow

jaymike

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Al,

Roughly speaking, 20% of the population pays 80% of the taxes. I'd say that means the rich are paying more than their fair share. Obama can lie and misrepresent all he wants. The rich are not the problem, the out of control government is.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Um Al...Do you really think its that simple? You're kidding right? Hasn't Obama had 4 years to get the rich to start paying taxes, and to "help the middle class"? How's that workin for ya?

Ray Fellows

12:45 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

A lot of political rhetoric being bantied about. Like I said in my first post, politics have nothing to do with decision. If I am the owner of a company that is 8 trillion dollars in debt and I hire a new CEO who told me he could turn everything around and after 3 years our debt had doubled, I would fire him in the spot. Nothing personal but he has failed as the leader of this country and proven that he has no idea how to get us back on track. So just like in 2008, I hire a new guy and give him a chance to do the job. In 3 years if he hasnt shown me anything, I will look at someone else.

We have to get past partisan politics and find someone who can run this country like a business. If America were a business, we would be in receivership right now being run by the bankruptcy court dissolving all of our assets!

Reply

Bob Mac

12:45 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I found that it depended on what channel you watched the RNC and unless you were tuned to C-SPAN you did not get a fair look at the convention. I tried flipping between FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc and each channel seemed to show only the speakers (or reply of soundbites) that each station wanted you to see resulting in different context all together.

If you watch the stories and comments of the speakers with an open mind you would see that our former Governor is a class act who cares about people and the country and respects opinions for both sides of an augment. I think Gov. Romney understands that this election is not about him and just his or the Republican ideas, but it's about what is BEST FOR AMERICA and I think we can count on him to make the right decisions for everyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

You had to watch the convention on C-Span if you wanted to hear the speakers' speeches. Every other channel had pundits doing all the talking and criticizing, with their biased spin. It's a pity those on TV have such low opinions of the American public. Apparently, they feel people lack the capacity to listen and form their own opinions. They all feel the need to tell us how we should think. It's a pity how many people fall for that and that applies to voters of both parties.

Larry

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I really do not want to vote for Romney. Having said that, I can not possibly even consider voting for Obama. I have had more than enough of his "Hope and Change"!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

11:13 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

I totally agree. I think Romney is socially awkward and fails to express himself properly. Despite that, I believe he has the analytical and management capability we need to turn the economy around. Obama is articulate and exudes a certain charm, but doesn't know what he's doing. It's a pity we could not have a candidate that combines the best traits of both. That being said, I'll be voting for Romney. While less than ideal, I think we stand a better chance of a financial recovery with him at the helm

Jim Rizoli

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Jenni Speed......Obammy is a racist term....LOL
He's been called worse.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Ray Fellows

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

I'm not rich and I'm voting for Romney. I make a pitance running a nonprofit and work at a deli part time to pay my bills. I cant afford to watch tax and spend liberals drive up our debt any longer. I have two boys just out of high school and their future depends on this election.

Like I said, again, we will never get this country back on its feet until we start thinking with our brains and not our hearts. Liberal ideas sound great until the bill has to be paid. Oh wait, we NEVER paid the bill, we keep charging it. We are bamkrupt and its time to settle our tab.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paula Leva

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Ray,
The current deficit began under the Bush administration when two wars were waged and the cost of those wars were not funded through an agreed upon budget. It took eight years of decreasing taxes, deregulating banks and corporations which brought us close to a depression. How does a president turn that kind economic debacle around with a house of representatives committed to his failure no matter what?
Did you watch any of the coverage of mitt Romney when he travelled to Europe this summer? He left Massachsetts with a deficit when he was governor partly due to the Big Dig that went millions of dollars over budget! When asked in several interviews lately how he intends to create jobs, his reply is vague and he will let us know once he is in the white house. The unemployment rate was well over 11% when Obama took office. Now the rate is closer to 8%. Cn the president alone convince the corporations to bring jobs back to this country? Where's the incentive???

Linda Worthy

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

“I will begin my presidency with a jobs tour. President Obama began with an apology tour,” proclaimed Mitt Romney.

PolitiFact, the Pulitzer-winning project of the Tampa Bay Times, the New York Times and The Washington Post all agree that Romney’s assertion that Obama began with an ‘apology tour’ is simply not true. They can not find any comments from Obama that support Romney’s ‘apology tour’ claim.

Romney claims that “Obama has thrown allies like Israel under the bus”. Independent experts on the Middle East assert, that while disagreements exist, that there is a strong level of co-operation between the U.S. and Israel. While in Israel, Romney praised their low GDP spending of 8 percent on healthcare. Then he learned their healthcare program is similar to Obama’s. Oops!

Romney and Ryan claim that Obama’s $716 billion dollar cut to Medicare to finance the Affordable Care Act will take money away from today’s seniors. This reduction will not do that but will rein in payments to hospitals and service providers. Ryan doesn’t want to talk about his $700 billion cut to Medicare which will be used to fund tax cuts for those making over $250,000. (All of you reading this making more than $250,000, please raise your hand).

The Bush tax cuts for the rich caused much of the increase in the debt and contributed to the economic crisis. Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act created between 1.4 and 3.3 million jobs according to the CBO.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paula Leva

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Thanks Linda for these FACTS!!

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

FACT:

As terrible as the Bush tax cuts must have been, Obama sure did cave in and extend them TWICE. When do we get to call them the Obama Tax Cuts? Seems like the only thing he has taken ownership of since he took office was OBL. And we all know that was going on behind the scenes anyway, and would have continued whether it was authorized by him or not.

Linda Worthy

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Romney claims that that he started Bain Capital with the idea that if he and his colleagues believed the advice they were giving their clients. was good advice, then they should form their own company and invest in those companies themselves. According to Michael Kranish and Scott Helman, authors of “The Real Romney”, the idea to form Bain Capital was part of an offer from Romney’s mentor at Bain & Co. Romney gained an agreement with Bain & Co. that if Bain Capital failed, he could return to Bain & Co. with all raises and benefits he would have received in the meantime. The authors also assert that Bain & Co. told Romney they would protect his reputation. Have you never wondered about the relationship between Bain & Co. and Bain Capital?

Romney is the first Rebublican nominee since 1952 not to mention war during his acceptance speech -- even though we are at war. You remember 9/11 -- terrorism? Neither Romney nor Ryan appear to. So much for a tough foreign policy. I guess there are no daughters or sons of Rupublicans in Afghan foxholes.

And Eastwood, that leader of the Hollywood conservatives who speaks -- rudely -- to empty chairs -- got it wrong. He blamed Obama for starting the war in Afghanistan. No so -- Bush junior started it. So if was foolhardy, Eastwood was criticizing Dudya.

In fact, Romney never even mentioned veterans. Think about that the next time you want to wave the flag and say ‘we’ll never forget our veterans.’ Romney did.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deb Nilan

6:59 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Linda we could continue to do a he said/she said match. The finger can be pointed in both directions with many different issues. Its getting old. Bottom line.....I can't afford another 4 years of this uncertainty. I am building my own business (or should I say the government is building my business) and working another 25 hours a week at a part time job, my husband works full time. Plain and simple we can't make ends meet....and the sad part is we cant get help anywhere! We make too much to qualify for any government help yet we need to chose how to come up with money for my kids school sneakers & school supplies (of which my mother in law bought). I stay up at night wondering how I am going to pay for my sons college education. My son can't even find a job to help save for his college expenses. I simply can not afford this for another 4 years.....Obama had his chance...when is enough enough?

Mike Long

2:52 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Mitt Romney has a proven record of success at taking broken institutions and turning them around. He did the same thing here in MA. When he became Governor Massachusetts, we were running a budget deficit. When he left we had a surplus. Under his leadership the school system became #1 in the nation.

This country has fiscal problems and educational problems. Mitt Romney solved those problems here in Mass. He can do it again at the Federal level.

Reply

Stephanie Frankie

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

For one of the Presidential Debates, can we see two empty chairs and either Charlie Sheen or Clint Eastwood moderate? My mute button or channel change button is automatic when political ads come on - both for President and U. S. Senate. Can't wait for November 7!

Reply

Kirby

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

If you are a woman, how can you possibly vote for Mitt Romney?
If you vote for Romney and you are a teacher, your unions will be gone. If you want to get paid what you deserve, forget it if you are a woman. He also wants to end any kind of birth control, as well as planned parenthood. You won't have worry about your job, I just realized, because you'll have too many children. Hey but if you are very rich and want to have no opinion as a woman...you go ahead and vote for Romney.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jaymike

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Corrine,

Large numbers of women actually understand that children are a blessing not a curse. They would not think of killing their offspring. So yes, many women will vote for Romney, not in spite of his anti-abortion stand, but because he shares their values.

Speaking about your concern for women, may I assume you voted for George HW Bush and Bob Dole? No way you would vote for a man who treats women like Bill Clinton did, right?

As for teachers and unions - a good teacher cares about kids while unions act on self interest often at the expense of children. Which do you care more about, kids or union strong-arm tactics?

Some of your other points are flat out factually inaccurate.

Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

To: Corrine B. Emge - I have no clue what your source of news is, but you need to seek additional sources. Almost everything in your posting is totally false. You need to change TV channels, radio stations, newspapers, etc. until you find a source of information, which is factual. By all means, vote for Obama. If he gets another four years in office, perhaps unemployment can reach 25% and entitlements programs can go completely bust.

Comment_arrow

Peg

2:45 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

I'm a woman and I'm voting for Romney, Corrine. The only thing the Democrats can come up with is the abortion/birth control issue, because they have nothing else to stand on. Obama has done a MISERABLE job and after almost 4 years continues to blame the Bush administration. Well the Bush administration didn't spend 4 trillion dollars in 2 years. And this "you'll have too many children?" Try a diaphragm, an IUD or a condom or pay for your own birth control pills like I did-don't ask me to do it for you. Insurance after all doesn't pay for men to get condoms now, does it?

So you see? I am a woman, I do have an opinion, I chose not to have children so I took care of it myself and yet I am not rich. And yes, I WILL vote for Romney, thank you very much!

Now go to the Elizabeth Warren crazy camp Corrine, they'll like you there-where lying, cheating and fraud run rampant.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

3:33 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Peg--President Obama is doing an excellent job--as many of the other commenters here have pointed out. Ending the vile war in Iraq, begun by the Republican cabal whose dishonest schemes provide the stark and immediate background to many of the current President's achievements. The capture of Osama Bin Laden. Making it legal for gay people in the military to acknowledge that they are gay. Dealing with the complex problem of illegal immigration in complex and humane ways--deporting more illegals than any previous president, but also treating fairly "illegal" children. The President has improved the employment figures, salvaged the American automobile industry, established (at LAST) the first incarnation of a universal health policy, continued to fight for college students and education in general, revived American prestige abroad (after a dismal decline during the previous regime), shored up the stock market, etc., etc. And no amount of repeating the lie that we are worse off now than we were four years ago will ever make it true.

Thank you for paying for your own birth control pills.

Obama 2012--the only choice for honest, working Americans!

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Dave Nolta...easy there Pal! Obama captured Osama? Really? And as a Republican who thought Bill Clinton was a GREAT president, I take offense to the comment that Obama is doing an excellent job! At best he has done a fair job. Can I ask are there still troops in Iraq? Afghanistan? Gitmo still open? So what promises has he actually fulfilled Dave? There's no guarantee that Romney will do any better, but he's got my vote. Businesses have to be jump started to get Americans back to work. I think Romney will do that. We need a strong military that will not be undercut by a President apologizing for it's actions while it's members are killed. Obama did get one thing right though in 2008...It's time for Change...in 2012! Go Mitt! And Dave, I am an honest 55 hour a week working American. I have other choices besides yours my friend!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:51 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

David Lenane--Kind of a cheap shot there, Pal! It's clear from the context, and it's a longstanding, and fair, tradition, to refer to something performed by the military as having been accomplished by its Commander in Chief--Wellington defeated Napoleon--hadn't you heard? Obama captured Osama, as opposed to Bush, whose family helped to create him. (If I had said the military captured Osama, or my Purple-Heart-decorated friend and former pupil, Joel, maybe you wouldn't have minded?) As for the Iraq War, Obama has indeed withdrawn, as promised, the American troops from that unbelievably expensive (in every sense) conflict begun by the last (it's still recent!), unforgivably deceitful, Republican regime (http://news.yahoo.com/obama-highlight-iraq-withdrawal-194612221.html). Yep, he's still got to work on Gitmo--but given his record of dedicating himself to and working for the things he believes in (the American working classes), I trust him. You know what that's like, working as hard as you do. And though it isn't the point, I think most people we know work as hard as well, personal interests aside...

Mark Farrell

3:50 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

With the National Debt of $16 Trillion, Unfunded Liabilities of $100 Trillion, 43 months of an unemployment rate over 8%, 23 million Americans out of work, a trade deficit for the first 8 months of 2012 at $380 Billion, and a US GDP growth rate of 1.85% for the first 6 months of 2012 it is time for a change!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max Walker

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

As the first steps towards addressing the debt:

-- end the wars
-- end the bush era tax cuts
-- return capital gains and dividend income tax rates to clinton era levels
-- reduce defense spending to zero
-- immediately means test current social security and medicare beneficiaries.

Comment_arrow

Paula Leva

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Not Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan! They don't have a plan to solve any of our problems!!

Stephen Faris

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

Hi Folks,
This election will be a repeat of Jimmy Carter versus Ronald Reagan. The incompentency of Obama is obvious to all. Romney will win in a landslide. Dont let the media fool you. Even in liberal Ma the message will be sent to the Dumbocrats.

Steve

Reply

Francis P. Ardito,Sr

5:25 pm on Saturday, September 1, 2012

The anti-Romney accusations are galling. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, George Axelrod, Debbie Wasserman Schultz made outrageous accusations that gullible people believe. The liberal Press don't fact check; send the garbage on! The CBO reference is reported differently, "Obamacare will cost $2 Trillion, 20 million uninsured & siphon almost $ 1Trillion from Medicare, while Ryan's plan won't end Medicare or affect anyone over 55 years old & save the program for future generations." NOBAMA, PLEASE !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max Walker

9:47 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

There are no accusations, just a request for specifics so we can debate the numbers. Otherwise we'll all be just throwing rhetorical bombs at each other with no light at the end of the tunnel.

Justin Taverna

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Well i look at like this, A vote for the party that took america from a budget surplus to a multi-trillion dollar defecit and start two wars in the course of 8 years and try to limit the rights of our "free" nation based on religious values in a country where seperation of church and state is strictly stated all the while trying to make more tax cuts for the rich because they earned it and the poor can suck it up and make due OR the party who is pulling out of said wars and has (somewhat) stabalized the economy. Take your pick guys.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

News Flash Justin!! The war with Afghanistan was started by the Taliban and Al-Queada when they ordered or supported the killing of 3,000 Americans. Did you conveniently forget that?

Comment_arrow

Roberta

8:25 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Justin is correct. Also, we need to get rid of some of the impediment in congress and actually get this country on the right track. The republicans have been unwilling to compromise and work with our president. The supreme court has made some outlandish decisions, that have set us back (except for Obama care). Blaming Obama for the failed Bush years is wrong. Why wasn't our former presidents Bush 1 & 2 at the convention and most of his cabinet? Why wasn't the veterans and wars mentioned in Romney's speech? Isn't anyone concerned about foreign policy?

Bob

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein

Re-Elect Obummer...I think NOT.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jhschool

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Funny, I felt the exact same way when there was a 2nd term for a 2nd Bush elected.

Bummer for you...

Bob

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Racism...??? Hmmmmm...
Is that when I am casting a vote for Romney or is it when 95%+ of the Black vote went to Obummer in 2008...I get confused.

I am voting against Obummer not because he's an incompetent Black but moreover because he IS an incompetent who just happens to be Black. I just hope that Condi will be part of the new administration (Is that being bigoted? She is a shining example of an extremely talented and gifted individual who just happens to be a woman and just happens to be Black...What if Obummer was a caucasian...would things have been different in 2008?...We know the answer, don't we?)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paula Leva

10:32 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Why do people cast their votes for leaders such as OBAMA...? Because they believed that he would lead this country in a different direction than the previous administration! Do you ever watch Bill Moyers? He did a great piece on Jack Abramoff, Grover Nordquist, and Ralph Reed today. The Republican Party is not the party of Eisenhower or Reagan. They are he'll bent on getting Republicans richer and gaining a power hold in our supposedly democratic government. I have no problem with people being wealthy or being successful. We all deserve the chance to make the life we choose ...basic and traditional American values...

Comment_arrow

Ed Bertorelli

8:46 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

And then Bob we have that great man of God the Reverend Wright- Obama's minister for how many years? If anyone could be tagged with the racist charge it would be him. Read "The Amateur" by Edward Klein-- pretty scary stuff.

Joe Rizoli

7:15 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Agreed, we need to end these wars we have no business in. We need to tell Israel to lay off of Iran. You don't start a war bcause you "think" a nation has nuclear weapons. What Israel is doing is beyond ludicrious. We don't need the Sampson Option here.
ALL nations on earth have a right to use and have nuclear power. To start all this "we think" again is sounding like the "I thinks" we had for Iraq. Those "I thinks" were ALL lies.

Stopping these wars will save TRILLIONS of dollars that can be put back into our own country to build our own infrastructure consisting of bridges, electical, roads, solar, wind, and other ways to fix our country.

If either of these two politicians don't want to end these wars then neither will get my vote. Ron Paul was the only one that understood this war situation.

Joe Rizoli

Reply

arnold

9:47 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

When my liberal TV director friend of over 40 years and life long Democrat called expressly to tell me he was going to vote Republican in this election, I asked what caused him to change parties. He told me when Obama stated he didn't build his business, a production company that he put up all of his assets to start, that was the straw that broke the camel's back. I suspect millions more who voted for Obama last time, even life long democrats, can't bring themselves to do it again. It may be the czars, subverting immigration enforcement,forcing Obamacare down our throats, blocking oil exploration, expanding the government workforce, non-existent transparency, asserting they didn't build their businesses, or a host of other reasons, they bring themselves to be duped again.

Reply

Brenda Crawshaw

9:47 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Here's a great article that explains in detail how Romney amassed considerable wealth for himself and his peers by destroying the livelihoods of middle class Americans. Read it and then share if you still think Romney is someone YOU want running our country.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829

Reply
Comment_arrow

Harold C

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Nice spin on partial stats again from the minions

HyeAghcheg

10:57 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

To: Joe Rizoli - By all means, cast your vote for Ron Paul, but it will yield no results. You're presenting a nice, idealistic viewpoint, but you're naive. Iran wants Israel blown off the map. Israel and the U.S. are not the only nations concerned with their activities. Every country in the Middle East, that is located in close proximity to Iran, is concerned. They feel that way, because they know the Iranian train of thought and the objectives they wish to accomplish.

Reply

HyeAghcheg

10:57 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

To: Brenda Crawshaw - Romney's objective in business is to maximize profits. He's got a solid track record of doing that. He never set out to destroy the middle class, despite what you think. Let me ask you this: how is Obama helping the middle class? Yes, he passed healthcare, but people cannot feed their families xrays and annual physicals. The lower and middle class need jobs! Obama has totally failed in his endeavor to solve the financial crisis. And wake up, his passing of Obamacare is going to harm the middle class, because they will ultimately be footing the bill for it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max Walker

12:21 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

The basic ideas for Obama's healthcare plans came from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. They were embraced by Gov. Romney to implement in MA. An idea that was good when it was mooted by conservatives doesn't suddenly become bad when it is embraced by a Democratic president. Many of the policies embraced and enacted by Obama were ideas that house Republicans have supported in the past. The only difference now is a Democratic president standing behind them.

Comment_arrow

Max Walker

12:21 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

If the US is run like a business what could be some possible outcomes. The best newsreporting team in the world takes a look:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/fri-august-31-2012/rnc-2012---the-road-to-jeb-bush-2016---the-best-f--king-news-team-ever-audits-america

Comment_arrow

Paula Leva

10:32 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

What will Romney do to create jobs? Corporations moved workforces oversees to avoid tangling with the unions and to increase their profit margins. Many of the corporations such as Dunkin Donuts, Home Depot, and Staples make it difficult for small business men to compete. I know this from personal experience!

HyeAghcheg

10:57 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

To: Paula Leva - Do you honestly believe Obama has a plan to solve our problems? In case you haven't noticed, he has not delivered on those promises from 2008. What makes you think he can do better in a second term? More of the same for an additional four year period would be devastating to this country financially. Nice guy, but he doesn't know what he's doing. Hope and change hasn't worked. All he's accomplished is the implementation of class warfare.

Reply

HyeAghcheg

10:57 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

To: Paula Leva - where are you getting your facts from? Unemployment was not 11% when Obama took office. Don't you remember, passing of the stimulus bill was supposed to prevent unemployment from hitting 8%. It's been over 8% for 42 months and we're still losing hundreds of thousands of jobs monthly. Romney inherited the mess from the Big Dig and cleaned it up. Please do your research.

Reply

Brenda Crawshaw

12:21 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Hye - there is nothing wrong with maximizing profits if that's your end all to be all. However, the systematic destruction of jobs while maximizing those profits - which by the way only went to Romney, Bain and the principals of those businesses - enitrely eroded swaths of the middle class. (Romney doesn't know how to do anything else - look at the spending on the Olympics he oversaw!)

And if you are hanging your hat on "Obamacare" being on of the negatives of Obama's administration, remember, Obama's plan was based on the plan that ROMNEY instituted here in Massachusetts with the cost cutting measures directed at FOR PROFIT insurance companies and medical facilities ERADICATED by the REPUBLICANS. You just can't have it both ways.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Proud Resident of Northborough

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Brenda, get real. Accusing Romney of the "systematic destruction of jobs" is foolish. Did some people lose jobs during restructuring? You bet! I have worked at plenty of firms that had to cut head in order to counteract declining revenues. Its called making hard choices! Sometimes thats required in order to save a company. Obama refuses to make hard choices, instead he prefers to pass this mess on to the next generation. I guess then it is fair to blame Obama for the "systematic destruction of jobs". After all look at the number of companies that have downsized under his watch. His numbers dwarf Romney's. Romney is credited with saving the Salt Lake Olympics and reigning in costs. You really need to get your spin machine under control. Your getting dizzy.

Comment_arrow

Brenda Crawshaw

8:47 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

No spin here, Proud. Did you read the article?

jim

12:21 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Mitt Romney is an liar who will say anything to get elected (see his performance in the primary against Newt) When he spews "Let 's take our country back! Exactly who is he taking it back from? It is subliminal garbage meant to paint Dems and Inds. as unpatriotic if they don't agree with the Repub. platform. I am an American and I love this country don't I am dismayed by the blind selfishness of the rich. We send our young (not Mitt's) to fight and die and defend this nation around the world and Bush passed those costs onto the next generation. Now they cry that the "job creators" will be hurt if we raise taxes on millionaires. Where were they job creators when Bush lowered taxes and went to war! Never in history have we fought two wars and lowered taxes. I don't like paying taxed anymore than any citizen but I recognize the need to share the sacrifice. The Repubs. seem to consider shared sacrifice to be "collectivism" It isn't. It is responsible citizenship. Not wastetful spending but prudent debt retirement and investment in ways to grow the economy.

Romney and Ryan would lead to massive unemployment growth, decreased quality of life for seniors and a frightening future for womens reproductive rights.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jaymike

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Jim,

Wondering why you and others use the term "reproductive rights" when, in fact, you are specifically speaking about abortion rights? Any chance you use the deceptive, flowery language because you understand abortion is evil?

A second question, when do responsibilities trump so called rights? For example, if a father or mother puts self interest over the well being of her child and the child suffers as a result, do you maintain consistency and demand that government not interfere with their parental rights to raise their child however they choose?

Linda Worthy

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Sally Kohn, a FOX News analyst said this aout Paul Ryan’s speech at the RNC:

"Ryan's speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech."

She went on to say that there were three words could describe his speech: “dazzling, distracting and deceptive”.

James Downie of The Washington Post blasted “Paul Ryan’s Breathtakingly Dishonest Speech”.

Ryan quoted Obama as saying, in February 2008, the Janesville GM plant would be open for another 100 years . He then blamed Obama for the plant closing. However, GM announced the closing of the Janeville plant in June 2008. The plant was closed while Bush was presient. The bailout of the auto industry saved dozens of GM factories and hundreds of thousands of jobs all along the supply chain. If Paul Ryan thinks that Obama could have kept that plant open over and above GM’s decision to close it, Paul Ryan must think government should decide which plants stay open and which are closed.

Paul Ryan said Obama’s stimulus plan was ‘a case of political patronage, corporate welfare, and cronyism...” The CBO said the stimulus is responsible for p to 3.3 million jobs and provided a tax cut for 95 percent of Americans.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Linda - you apparently are not a regular viewer of Fox News or else you would know that Sally Kohn just joined them as a Liberal analyst. So that means that she has a slanted view from the Left, just like Sean Hannity has a slanted view from the Right. So if you are going to quote an impartial voice, please do some homework first before you bloviate here!!

Linda Worthy

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Paul Ryan said Obama was stealing $716 billion from Medicare ‘to pay for a new entitlement we didn’t even ask for”. The CBO said this money results from reducing payments to insurance companies and hospitals. These cuts are also credited with extending the life of Medicare for 8 years. Paul Ryan says he wants to protect the poor but he wants to cut $700 billion from Medicaid and use it as a tax cut for those making over $250,000.

Paul Ryan has ripped Obama for voting against the Simpson-Bowles recommendations. Paul Ryan didn’t tell you that he was member of Simpson-Bowles Commission and that he also voted against those recommendations.

Paul Ryan claimed that Obama was responsible for the downgrading of the credit rating of the United States. Ryan didn’t tell that the organization issuing that downgrade specifically cited the Republican House of Representatives for refusing to raise the debt-ceiling -- which has been raised numerous times under numerous presidents.

Paul Ryan signed Grover Norquist’s pledge of no tax increases for the rich. You can not find an independent economist who thinks the United States can solve its financial problems without both spending cuts and tax increases.

Paul Ryan decried Obama’s stimulus package and then wrote at least four letters seeking money from that very stimulus package. He secured $20 million for Wisconsin businesses and home owners to improve their energy efficiency.

Reply

Linda Worthy

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Paul Ryan is all for smaller government but he supported Bush Medicare prescription drug program, The TRAP bailout of Wall Street and the auto bailout.

Paul Ryan co-sponsored a bill in the House with Todd Aiken that allowed for an exception to a ban on abortion in cases of 'forcible rape'. Two hundred Republican members of Congress signed onto that bill. To add the modifier 'forcible' to the word 'rape' more than implies that these folks think that rape is sometimes not 'forcible'. Are we still fighting the notion that some women 'ask for it' by their choice of attire or behavior?

The anti-abortion plank of the Republican party provides no exception for abortion in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. This would have the effect of requiring all rape and incest victims, who become pregnant, to carry the rapist's child to term. Some women might choose to do that; the platform of the Republican party would requie it. The Republican Party's position would require a mother to die. Thrity-eight states extend parental rights to a rapist.

Romney has carved out an exception for abortion in the cases of rape and incest but if he is the head of the Republican Party in 2012, why does the platform not reflect his views? Why does he not have the power to force his views onto the platform?

We are one Supreme Court Justice away from losing Roe v. Wade.

I do not want Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan picking any nominees for the Supreme Court -- ever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Harold C

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

You just want the ones Obama has appointed? disgraceful

Comment_arrow

Brenda Crawshaw

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Linda Worthy - I want to buy you lunch!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:59 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

And I'm buying Brenda lunch, and I've got a coupon from D'Angelo's that'll pay for mine!

Jim Rizoli

1:53 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

All politicians "lie" to get elected. Or should I say, they tell some pretty good stories.
The ones who tell the truth don't get elected. Ron Paul perfect example.
People don't want to hear the truth they want to hear what they want to hear.
The more fairy taleish the story is the more they will believe it.
So the best story teller get the job. Not to hard to understand.
How about that "change" Obama promised last time? The only change I see is the change missing from my pocket.
How many out there will look at the promises that were made to what the reality is?
If a person says he's going to do something than why do people not take them up on it later. I guess people have short memories and that's what the politicians bank on.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Max Walker

5:28 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

For those who uncritically buy the Republican dogma that lower capital gains and dividend income rates automatically create jobs, watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBx2Y5HhplI&feature=player_embedded

Reply

Al L

8:47 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Obama is a president that has delivered health care to every single American in every corner of the country after 90 years of trying. Here is a president who presided over the creation of 4.5 million jobs in 2 and 1/2 years, which by the way is more jobs than 8 years under Goerge W. Bush. Here is a president that saved the American auto industry from extinction and the American financial industry from self- destruction. There are 95,000 people in Massachusetts alone who get a paycheck on account of the recovery act. We have the end to" Don't ask "Don't tell.' We have equal pay for equal work, a nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia, Osama Bin Laden, Whitey Bulger, the end of war in Iraq. All under Obama's watch. Hmmm. Not bad for 4 years work. I'll take it. This race won't even be close. Maybe next time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Long

11:01 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Al, I suspect you are correct when you say that this race won't even be close. However I think it won't be close for different reasons than you.

The fundamental thing that today's conservative/libertarian activists are fighting for is the restoration of individual rights. We have morphed into a society where it is assumed that individuals do not have rights unless the government has explicitly passed a law. The truth is that in America individuals have alienable rights granted to us by our creator. It is the governments rights that are limited. When the government passes a bill such as Obamacare, that few if any of our representatives read much less understood, it is a flagrant violation of our individual rights. That is why Americans have been fighting the idea of Obamacare for 90 years. And the fight is not over.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:28 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

No, the fight isn't over, but at last it's well under way. Health care IS a human right, and there is no life, nor liberty, nor pursuit of happiness, without it. It IS a right, and it doesn't limit our other rights, contrary to your predictable squawking. And Romney had a moment of clarity when he came to Massachusetts (kudos us!), and he can NEVER go back! Obama 2012--if you're a working person, he's the only hope!

Comment_arrow

jaymike

8:45 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

Health care is a human right? How do you define human right?

Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

No Dave, Health Care is not a Human Right, it is a service that is offered by people who worked long and hard to attain knowledge of how to be a doctor or surgeon. If Obama's plan on "saving Medicare" goes forward, which means that he will cut the amount that is paid for services. What do you think Doctors will do if that happens??!! Either stop seeing Medicare patients or go elsewhere to work. If Obama passed a law stating that people shouldn't pay the amount you are asking for your services, what would you do? Would you be outraged or would you say, "Well that's OK, people have a RIGHT to what I offer at a price lower than what I need to survive." PLEASE.....Your ignorance is dripping all over the carpet. Get out before you create a mess that even you can't clean up!!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

3:14 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Joe Kane--In most civilized nations, where health care exists, it is considered a human right. Or hadn't you heard of England and Canada and Italy and Germany and France and etc.? As I've said here before, there is no life, and so no liberty--not to mention, no pursuit of happiness--without basic health care. Jefferson's great expression of our inalienable rights is unthinkable without that--it is utterly dependent upon the premise that basic health care is available from the very beginning of life, though no doubt you know of babies who birthed themselves, or who had already worked to earn the money necessary to pay their doctor bills... I think, Joe Kane, we will all be better off when you are guaranteed access to the medication you so obviously and urgently need.

Good luck with your drip.

Comment_arrow

jaymike

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Dave,

I notice that you consistently refuse to answer simple and basic questions that naturally arise from comments you post. Earlier, you could not explain when you say life begins. Now you claim health care is a "human right," but when I ask how you define human rights, you have no answer.

You reference Jefferson to defend yourself in a subsequent post. Did I miss a history lesson? I don't recall the people of Jefferson's day having government health care.

Then you mention babies, apparently indicating health care is a human right for them which is odd because you don't think they have a right to life.

So let's try again, if you insist health care is a human right, your words have no value if you cannot explain why. Let's start at the beginning - what is a human right? And why is health care missing from the list of inalienable rights our Founders cited were endowed by our Creator.

By the way, do you believe in a Creator? What do you know about him?

Maybe you have some interesting points to offer, maybe not. I do not know. I have noticed, up to now at least, no effort by you to explain your logic or offer solid principles upon which your views are ground. Now is your chance. Maybe you can score some converts.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:44 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Jaymike--It looks to me like you're missing more than one history lesson. And as I've explained more often than necessary, it's not your concern when I, David Nolta, think life begins--when life begins is debatable (do you still not understand that? the concept of the debatable?), and no one person gets to decide for another person. I'm sorry that my reading of Jefferson and my understanding of basic health care as a natural human right, upon which Jefferson's rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" all, to some extent, depend, offends and irritates you; but I am apparently not alone in this reading (check THE WORLD, NOW, not in Jefferson's time, when slaves were legal and women couldn't vote. Its called PROGRESS, this slow evolution of the recognition of the rights of all human beings, and AMERICA specializes in it. Aren't you proud?).
Now you want to know if I, David Nolta, believe in a Creator. You would have to be so much nicer to elicit any sharing of my religious ideas in what is--as far as I'm concerned--an impersonal forum. Ask me nicely, tell me why it is important to you and maybe I will tell you, just because you want to know, what I think about that. But WHATEVER I think about it, it isn't my job or yours to insist that others believe in anything we believe in. THAT, for me, is the beginning of a good religion.

Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

So Dave. What is your plan when it comes to Food? Is that a Human Right as well? Will those who cannot come up with the money to afford food call for money from the rest of us? Will you be the first to offer assistance? Or will you be the first top ask the rest of us for money??!!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:35 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Yes, Joe Kane, in a civilized nation, freedom from hunger is a basic right. And yes, again, Joe Kane, all I want from you is your money, so I can eat. Jheesh. Where were you raised? WERE you raised? The clock is ticking, and you are moving backward at a most alarming rate.

Elsa Aviza

10:32 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Obama will WIN because Women will remember in November !

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kirby

11:01 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Thank you Elsa...Yes they will.

Comment_arrow

Harold C

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Will the women believe the nonsense being put out? I would think women are smarter than that sorry. Maybe not you but most.

Comment_arrow

Mom's for Mitt

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Elsa...can't say I'm with you. This election is NOT about women's issues. Don't make us women out to be that narrow minded. Obama's people are making it about women because he can't run on his record in the last 3.5 years.

If Obama gets in for another 4 years...he's totally unleashed and that is scary!!

I am woman, hear me roar...VOTE for MITT!

Comment_arrow

Peg

2:45 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Romney will win because women will remember in November that they're having a hard time feeding their kids, not aborting them.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

5:08 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Yes, Mom's for Mitt--This election is SO about women's rights, and the economy, and the military, and gay rights, and illegal immigration reform, and a WHOLE lot of other things. Honestly, how peremptory, to say this election isn't about something that matters to others. All big elections are about all the issues that matter!

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Avoided Scandal: As of November 2011, served longer than any president in decades without a scandal, as measured by the appearance of the word “scandal” (or lack thereof) on the front page of the Washington Post.
Oh Oh..... Romney: Bian Investigated over tax strategy.* Bain, Romney's former firm, among those subpoenaed. A probe into a potential tax dodge by the industry could further play into the Democrats' hands.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama:Passed the Stimulus: Signed $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009 to spur economic growth amid greatest recession since the Great Depression. Weeks after stimulus went into effect, unemployment claims began to subside. Twelve months later, the private sector began producing more jobs than it was losing, and it has continued to do so for twenty-three straight months, creating a total of nearly 3.7 million new private-sector jobs.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Passed Wall Street Reform: Signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) to re-regulate the financial sector after its practices caused the Great Recession. The new law tightens capital requirements on large banks and other financial institutions, requires derivatives to be sold on clearinghouses and exchanges, mandates that large banks provide “living wills” to avoid chaotic bankruptcies, limits their ability to trade with customers’ money for their own profit, and creates the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (now headed by Richard Cordray) to crack down on abusive lending products and companies.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Recapitalized Banks: In the midst of financial crisis, approved controversial Treasury Department plan to lure private capital into the country’s largest banks via “stress tests” of their balance sheets and a public-private fund to buy their “toxic” assets. Got banks back on their feet at essentially zero cost to the government.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Toppled Moammar Gaddafi: In March 2011, joined a coalition of European and Arab governments in military action, including air power and naval blockade, against Gaddafi regime to defend Libyan civilians and support rebel troops. Gaddafi’s forty-two-year rule ended when the dictator was overthrown and killed by rebels on October 20, 2011. No American lives were lost.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Told Mubarak to Go: On February 1, 2011, publicly called on Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to accept reform or step down, thus weakening the dictator’s position and putting America on the right side of the Arab Spring. Mubarak ended thirty-year rule when overthrown on February 11.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Improved America’s Image Abroad: With new policies, diplomacy, and rhetoric, reversed a sharp decline in world opinion toward the U.S. (and the corresponding loss of “soft power”) during the Bush years. From 2008 to 2011, favorable opinion toward the United States rose in ten of fifteen countries surveyed by the Pew Global Attitudes Project, with an average increase of 26 percent.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Kicked Banks Out of Federal Student Loan Program, Expanded Pell Grant Spending: As part of the 2010 health care reform bill, signed measure ending the wasteful decades-old practice of subsidizing banks to provide college loans. Starting July 2010 all students began getting their federal student loans directly from the federal government. Treasury will save $67 billion over ten years, $36 billion of which will go to expanding Pell Grants to lower-income students.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Increased Support for Veterans: With so many soldiers coming home from Iraq and Iran with serious physical and mental health problems, yet facing long waits for services, increased 2010 Department of Veterans Affairs budget by 16 percent and 2011 budget by 10 percent. Also signed new GI bill offering $78 billion in tuition assistance over a decade, and provided multiple tax credits to encourage businesses to hire veterans.

Reply

Al L

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Tightened Sanctions on Iran: In effort to deter Iran’s nuclear program, signed Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act (2010) to punish firms and individuals who aid Iran’s petroleum sector. In late 2011 and early 2012, coordinated with other major Western powers to impose sanctions aimed at Iran’s banks and with Japan, South Korea, and China to shift their oil purchases away from Iran.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peg

2:45 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Nice copying and pasting job there. You must have gotten it from CNN or Fox news. You didn't happen to mention that most of these programs were already in the works before the election.

Jim Rizoli

1:29 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Elsa..Since when are womens rights a responsibility of a man or Govt?
All these "rights" issues are a joke.
But I will say this, I do believe a women/men etc... should be able to decide what they can do with there own body with this one caveat....whatever decision they make they will have to answer to God for for it in the end. Man's opinion is the least of the problems.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

jaymike

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Corrine,

You mention "your God." Do you believe there are many different Gods or do you just think Jim has a wrong view of God? If it is the latter, what is the correct view of God.

Apparently, you think "Jim's God" is "mean" because he says people will have to answer to God. Would it be mean for God to punish a man or woman for killing another without remorse, or would that be just?

David Nolta

4:05 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Al Linane--Hero of the WEEK! Thanks so much for all that work! Now if people are willing to read and to think about what you've explained so comprehensively, they will see just how amazingly fortunate we are.

Reply

Linda Worthy

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

2016:Obama’s America, the movie, is a work of far right imagination and distortion. It reminds me of Paul Ryan’s convention speech.

Dinesh D’Souza got his start in politics working in the Reagan White House. It breaks little new ground, mainly recounting history that is familiar from Obama’s own autobiography. But it’s conclusions and it’s self-professed ability to see into the future render it silly and useless.

The film is based on D’Souza’s book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” and a 2010 Forbes article, "How Obama Thinks." wherein D’Souza claims Obama is “a man driven by the anti-colonial ideology of his father...” D’Souza concludes his Forbes article by writing: "Our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anti-colonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son.”

This claim is astounding given the limited contact D’Souza admits Obama had with his father. D’Souza makes the wild leap that because the father was not around to radicalize the son, proves that the father did radicalize the son. This, of course, led directly to Obama passing the health care plan the Republicans and the Heritage Foundation created in the 90’s and Romney instituted in Massachusetts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda I have not seen the movie and I won't comment on it. I don't like Obama but I don't hate the man either. Movies and statements like that are foolish in my opinion. Even the President cannot carry out his own agenda unchecked. I hope Romney wins, but on a level playing field. Not because of crackpots in my party or the Tea Party.

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Created Conditions to Begin Closing Dirtiest Power Plants: New EPA restrictions on mercury and toxic pollution, issued in December 2011, likely to lead to the closing of between sixty-eight and 231 of the nation’s oldest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants. Estimated cost to utilities: at least $11 billion by 2016. Estimated health benefits: $59 billion to $140 billion. Will also significantly reduce carbon emissions and, with other regulations, comprises what’s been called Obama’s “stealth climate policy.”

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Passed Credit Card Reforms: Signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act (2009), which prohibits credit card companies from raising rates without advance notification, mandates a grace period on interest rate increases, and strictly limits overdraft and other fees.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Eliminated Catch-22 in Pay Equality Laws: Signed Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009, giving women who are paid less than men for the same work the right to sue their employers after they find out about the discrimination, even if that discrimination happened years ago. Under previous law, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the statute of limitations on such suits ran out 180 days after the alleged discrimination occurred, even if the victims never knew about it.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

. Obama Protected Two Liberal Seats on the U.S. Supreme Court: Nominated and obtained confirmation for Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic and third woman to serve, in 2009; and Elena Kagan, the fourth woman to serve, in 2010. They replaced David Souter and John Paul Stevens, respectively.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Improved Food Safety System: In 2011, signed FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, which boosts the Food and Drug Administration’s budget by $1.4 billion and expands its regulatory responsibilities to include increasing number of food inspections, issuing direct food recalls, and reviewing the current food safety practices of countries importing products into America.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Achieved New START Treaty: Signed with Russia (2010) and won ratification in Congress (2011) of treaty that limits each country to 1,550 strategic warheads (down from 2,200) and 700 launchers (down from more than 1,400), and reestablished and strengthened a monitoring and transparency program that had lapsed in 2009, through which each country can monitor the other.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Expanded National Service: Signed Serve America Act in 2009, which authorized a tripling of the size of AmeriCorps. Program grew 13 percent to 85,000 members across the country by 2012, when new House GOP majority refused to appropriate more funds for further expansion.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama. Expanded Wilderness and Watershed Protection: Signed Omnibus Public Lands Management Act (2009), which designated more than 2 million acres as wilderness, created thousands of miles of recreational and historic trails, and protected more than 1,000 miles of rivers.

Reply

Linda Worthy

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

D’Souza interviews a psychiatrist who says that an absentee father often has a significant influence on his son. No news there. But suggesting the son inherits the absent father’s mindset must mean that D’Souza believes Obama has the ability to contact the dead.

D’Souza attempts to prove that men Barack Obama met along the way have caused him to want to turn the United States into a socialist state and destroy Israel. D’Souza talks about Bill Ayers who Obama met 25 years after Ayers’ association with the Weather Underground; Edward Said, a pro-Palestinian professor; and Frank Davis, a friend of Obama’s grandfather, who was a member of the Communist Party in the 1940’s.

This 89 minute attack ad uses over 100 credited actors to play out re-enactments or just plain imaginary scenes. No opposing views are allowed to cloud D’Souza’s conclusions.

This film fails as a documentary. Documentaries are designed to evolve to reveal facts and perhaps even a truth. D’Souza’s film simply plays out what he has already written and lectured about.

At one point D’Souza attaches great importance to a simple preposition in the title of Obama’s autobiography: He says, "Notice it says ‘Dreams From My Father”, not “Dreams of My Father."

2016: Obama's America won’t be convincing any undecideds to vote for Romney. Heavily promoted by Fox News and Russ Limbaugh, even the most ardent Obama-haters should not be taken in by D’Souza’s self-promotion.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Gave the FDA Power to Regulate Tobacco: Signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (2009). Nine years in the making and long resisted by the tobacco industry, the law mandates that tobacco manufacturers disclose all ingredients, obtain FDA approval for new tobacco products, and expand the size and prominence of cigarette warning labels, and bans the sale of misleadingly labeled “light” cigarette brands and tobacco sponsorship of entertainment events.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

ObamaPushed Federal Agencies to Be Green Leaders: Issued executive order in 2009 requiring all federal agencies to make plans to soften their environmental impacts by 2020. Goals include 30 percent reduction in fleet gasoline use, 26 percent boost in water efficiency, and sustainability requirements for 95 percent of all federal contracts. Because federal government is the country’s single biggest purchaser of goods and services, likely to have ripple effects throughout the economy for years to come.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Trimmed and Reoriented Missile Defense: Cut the Reagan-era “Star Wars” missile defense budget, saving $1.4 billion in 2010, and canceled plans to station antiballistic missile systems in Poland and the Czech Republic in favor of sea-based defense plan focused on Iran and North Korea.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Began Post-Post-9/11 Military Builddown: After winning agreement from congressional Republicans and Democrats in summer 2011 budget deal to reduce projected defense spending by $450 billion, proposed new DoD budget this year with cuts of that size and a new national defense strategy that would shrink ground forces from 570,000 to 490,000 over the next ten years while increasing programs in intelligence gathering and cyberwarfare.

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Let Space Shuttle Die and Killed Planned Moon Mission: Allowed the expensive ($1 billion per launch), badly designed, dangerous shuttle program to make its final launch on July 8, 2011. Cut off funding for even more bloated and problem-plagued Bush-era Constellation program to build moon base in favor of support for private-sector low-earth orbit ventures, research on new rocket technologies for long-distance manned flight missions, and unmanned space exploration, including the largest interplanetary rover ever launched, which will investigate Mars’s potential to support life.

Reply

Jim Rizoli

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Corrine.....My God should be the same as your God.....you might want to try to understand where he is coming from. We all have to answer to him as he is the lawmaker and life giver.
Jim@ccfiile.com

Reply

Al L

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Obama Invested Heavily in Renewable Technology: As part of the 2009 stimulus, invested $90 billion, more than any previous administration, in research on smart grids, energy efficiency, electric cars, renewable electricity generation, cleaner coal, and biofuels.

Reply

Joe Rizoli

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Corrine, if Jim's God sounds mean then Godly patents
are mean too. Maybe it's time you got your head out of the clouds and into a good book, like the Bible. The world is going to be judged by the man on the white horse who it is said "judges in righteousness" Rev 19

Joe Rizoli

Reply

Joe Rizoli

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Sorry Al, I just started and finished the book War and Peace while you posted, what was that about Obama?

Joe Rizoli

Reply

Rich A

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

This comment thread is a perfect example of how the two-party system has destroyed any semblance of rationality in American politics. People honestly believe that Candidate A from their party is the perfect leader and will right every wrong, while Candidate B from the other party is inept, evil, and the cause of all wrongs.

Both candidates have strengths and weaknesses. Be objective, research the facts, and follow the money. Make use of sites like PolitiFact or FactCheck and OpenSecrets. Further, in this election especially, understand the complexity of the economy and understand that the President has limited ability to influence it for good or for ill. Pay attention to what Congress has been doing; the divisiveness there has been toxic to us and both parties are to blame. Don't buy into the spin, rhetoric, and talking points.

...or just be lazy and continue to parrot "us good them bad" like Anne Coulter and Chris Mattews, then wonder why things really aren't any better in 2016.

Reply

Dave Lenane

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

And Al...all of us Republicans could copy and paste many of the embarassing apologies that Obama has made unbidden on behalf of all Americans! He had his chance! Now lets give Romney his...then in 4 years we can always switch back! Go Mitt!

Reply

Dave Lenane

6:27 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

Makes you wonder who really cuts taxes for the middle class? Seems to me that Bush did the work and Obama wants the credit!

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/07/obama-team-millions-face-tax-hikes-if-all-bush-rates-expire/1

Reply

Al L

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I'll tell you something, the RNC showed us a thing or two with their surprise , ace in the hole, secret weapon , guest speaker. Wow I was impressed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb7wQe03ol8

Reply

Ed Bertorelli

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama-he makes that utter failure Jimmy Carter look like FDR. Clint Eastwood had it right empty chair ans empty suit with an idiot Joe Biden for VP

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:31 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Ed--And you talking about rudeness and name-calling!

Obama 2012! The only candidate for the intelligent, working American.

Comment_arrow

Al L

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Improved School Nutrition: In coordination with Michelle Obama, signed Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act in 2010 mandating $4.5 billion spending boost and higher nutritional and health standards for school lunches. New rules based on the law, released in January, double the amount of fruits and vegetables and require only whole grains in food served to students.

Comment_arrow

Ed Bertorelli

5:42 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

actually let me retract 'idiot' - I think hapless would be more accurate-

Ray Fellows

12:18 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Wow. So much for taking the politics out of it. No one else matters, its Obama that is in office right now and he has not done the job. He and Bobby Valentine have failed and need to be fired.

I am leaving this discussion because some of the comments are so ignorant, my head wants to explode when thinking about replies.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:48 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

If exposure to ignorance makes your head explode, there would be a lot less noise, and very few people to appreciate it.

Yeah, right, Mittens is going to work for you!

OBAMA 2012--the only choice for honest, working Americans.

Al L

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Expanded Hate Crimes Protections: Signed Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2009), which expands existing hate crime protections to include crimes based on a victim’s sexual orientation, gender, or disability, in addition to race, color, religion, or national origin.

Reply

Al L

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Brokered Agreement for Speedy Compensation to Victims of Gulf Oil Spill: Though lacking statutory power to compel British Petroleum to act, used moral authority of his office to convince oil company to agree in 2010 to a $20 billion fund to compensate victims of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico; $6.5 billion already paid out without lawsuits. By comparison, it took nearly two decades for plaintiffs in the Exxon Valdez Alaska oil spill case to receive $1.3 billion.

Reply

Ed Bertorelli

8:25 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

good move Ray...things are headed to the Twilight Zone..fast

Reply

Dave Lenane

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Dave...please check what you are saying. I'm honest and voting for Romney.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

4:45 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Dave--Are you messing with me today? When I say, "OBAMA 2012--the only choice for honest, working Americans," I am saying, pretty clearly, that I think President Obama is the best choice--that he will do the best job, that he will work harder than the other guy--for honest, working Americans, and that he best represents and will continue defend the interests of honest, working Americans. That INCLUDES you, Dave. Whether or not you vote for him. If you are honest and hardworking, as you say.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

9:45 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Dave...that is exactly what I say! I work damn hard for my money and will proudly vote for Mitt Romney!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:48 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

And I work just as hard, I hope, and I will vote for President Obama! Shocker!

Chris L.

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama has done, at best, a fair job. He had a Congress that had the numbers stacked in his favor for the 1st half of his term. The main thing he spent his political capital on, was health care.

Unfortunately, he called in almost all of his favors to get that bill passed. He had to eat crow and extend the Bush Tax Cuts twice, just to get anything else through Congress.

Its good that we have Universal Health Care on the way. Obama didn't spend his political efforts getting people back to work, where they could have participated in health care as part of a free market economy. I, as a working taxpayer, look forward to making sure others don't have any reason to go to work. Between EBTs and Health Care, their benefits package for Unemployment rivals that of many Fortune 500's.

I wonder how much money some of the medical lobbies have donated to his reelection fund? He wrote them a pretty big check with the health care act. We all know that he would NEVER accept large donations after taking such good care of Big Medical, right? ;-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

9:45 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Chris, Obama himself couldn't even give himself a grade. He said it was incomplete. In school that meant summer school. Our American President himself said he is a DUNCE!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:49 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Watch out Dave--the wise man is the one who knows there's more to do.

Linda Worthy

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

You are the Job Creators

Think about a small business --- the ones that are said to create the majority of new jobs. It could be a restaurant, a landscaper, a car dealer, or a maker of widgets.

Let’s say a person and starts a small company to build a better widget. Like all business owners, she struggles to control the cost of inventory, raw materials, shipping, wages, etc.

She makes great widgets but if no one buys her widgets she doesn’t need inventory, raw materials, a shipper nor does she have to pay wages. No demand for her widgets means no employees -- no jobs.

There’s no demand for her widgets because consumers do not have the money to spend for new widgets.

Let’s assume that a YouTube video of her widgets goes viral and demand for her widgets explodes. She needs more inventory, raw materials, more shipping and more employees. More employees?

I think the demand for her widgets created those additional jobs. And who was buying those widgets -- who was creating that demand -- well -- you and your friends and the folks down the street in your middle class neighborhood in your middle class town.

You are the job creators.

It is a political lie that the rich create jobs.

Reply

Linda Worthy

2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives agree that a tax cut for the middle class would be a good thing. You know -- the middle class -- you.

The Republicans won’t allow this middle class tax cut because they want to extend the tax cut to the folks beyond the middle class. The folks making more than $250,000 per year -- you know -- the group which does not include you...the group which does not create jobs.

So you do not get your tax cut.

You can not buy new widgets.

You do not create new jobs.

The economy does not move forward.

Vote Republican. Vote for Grover Norquist.

Reply

FindBalance

3:34 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Linda – If she does not come up with a better widget, there will be no better widget for consumers to buy. 0 supply, therefore no jobs created *and* the consumer does not get the benefit of a better widget.

Also, the consumer does not take on the personal and financial risk, or put in the sweat equity to build the business that creates the jobs, and the consumer has no obligation to the employees.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Worthy

11:48 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

FB,
If your intention was to state the obvious, you succeeded.

I do wonder, however, why you sought to change the scenario so that the woman failed in her attempt. I said she made "great widgets" and it seems you wanted to take that away.

I said, "...she struggles to control the cost of inventory, raw materials, shipping, wages, etc. "
THAT is taking on the personal and financial risk and the sweat equity. But with a warehouse full of 'great widgets' and no demand, she cannot add more jobs.

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

11:08 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda - I believe your point was that the consumer is the job creator because if they do not purchase the better widget, there will be no jobs created.

My point is that the business owner is the job creator because without them creating and selling a better widget, there will be no jobs created, and there will not even be a better widget for the consumer to buy (and they would lose out, too). You misunderstood that she failed – I was saying if she (or any other potential business owner) didn’t even try to create a better widget, no jobs would be created.

Peg

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Roberta: "The republicans have been unwilling to compromise and work with our president."

Are you just kidding me? Is that what you think? It's just the Republicans????? Do you understand why nothing has gotten done-because Obama and the Democrats refuse to compromise on anything????? You must be very young or very uninformed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

9:45 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Peg...Don't even bother trying. This conversation has been hijacked by Obama hyped loyalists, who can't get in touch with reality that their President hasn't accomplished anything but Obamacare. He helped to bust the Unions that he promised to help in Wisconsin. His campaign promises remain just empty promises. He extended the BUSH taxcuts to the middle class, and made no decision on Immigration. So what has changed?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:51 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Get your head out of the sand! He's done a LOT with regard to immigration. He's deported more in four years than your beloved Bush in eight. AND he's treated the "illegal" children in a humane way. You got a problem with that?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

10:55 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

And Dave L--"Hijacked"? You don't like what somebody says, it's hijacking? Or you think some people shouldn't comment so much? What's too much--YOU get to decide that? Whaaaa? Have you read the comments about President Obama's accomplishments? Pretty interesting, and challenging, and a lot more than "Obamacare" to talk about. Show a little respect for your fellow posters--you've made up your mind, but just because somebody disagrees with you doesn't make that person a hijacker. What a disappointment!

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

12:33 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Yes Dave Nolta...Hijacked! How many times have you posted here? It's ridiculous! Between You and Al L learning how to copy and paste, I bet that's 50 percent of the postings on this topic. I remember you complaining about that earlier this year. I dont remember anyone complaining when Bush sent those troops into Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11. His mistake was no clear exit strategy. Obama has carried that on. And as far as respect for posters...look in the mirror! I am an honest hard working American. I don't need to be told that by you! Loved how you added.."If I say so..." I am! You have way to much time on your hands to keep posting like this.....

Comment_arrow

Brenda Crawshaw

12:46 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

WRONG Dave Lenane! Bush's mistake was using information he and his whole administration knew was FALSE to invade. He wanted payback for his daddy and he used US and OUR DAMNED MONEY to do it. So now he and Cheney are sitting on piles and piles of our money all for naught. A LOT of us complained because Al Quada is NOT Iran and Afghanistan; in fact, where was Bin Laden found? Oh, within the borders of one of our ALLIES for God's sake. So don't defend indefensible actions to try to make a baseless point.

And if you aren't comfortable with all of the postings that are providing FACTUAL examples of the accomplishments of the Obama administration, go ahead and see if you can unearth any worthwhile accomplishments from Romney. We'll wait - we've got months........

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

1:39 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Thanks for the sound response, Brenda. And Dave L., you remember nothing that you claim about me, because I did not make any such complaints. And don't you worry, Dave, I am not going to accuse you of being an honest man. A bit perfidious, yes. And by the way, LOTS of people complained LOUDLY about the American invasion of Iraq after 911--and many more were against it, including Mr. Obama. Where were you? Not listening as usual. And again, it's not up to you to tell people how often they can comment. Just a reminder. And it isn't quantity or numbers that matter in a hijacking, but a selfish and overbearing attitude. You'll be doing fine I guess.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

2:30 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Ok Brenda....what was Mass. Unemployment when Romney left? What is it now? How about unemployment when Bush left? What is it now? And Brenda what was Bush supposed to do after 9/11 and knowing that Iraq and Afghanistan were harboring terrorists? And there are more troops in Afghanistan now then when Bush left office. Fact not opinion. So apparently Obama feels there is a reason to be there as well.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

4:40 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Don't worry Dave...I know u aren't honest either. Sad that u can't have a conversation wothout stooping to name calling and insults. As far as where I was at 9/11 ...I was supporting the family of my friend Mark Bavis who was killed. I never thought the Dems would be so worried about this election...u have given me hope! I have a job, so I'm going to work Dave.

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

4:40 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

The only thing sound about Brenda's post was LOUD

Comment_arrow

Brenda Crawshaw

4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Dave L. - I am surprised that you would even ATTEMPT to compare the economy at the end of Romney's governorship with the economy now; I agree that the unemployment rates in MA are worse today but they are better than 38 other states in the country right now which is, incidentally, EXACTLY where it was in 2007. (Massachusetts is currently ranked 12th in the nation, behind four states who are experiencing a HUGE boom in oil).

Again Bush didn't know SQUAT about where the terrorists were, he wanted to slap Iraq in the face for attempting to take out his Daddy and Afghanistan was it the way. The reason there are so many troops there now is because the size and impact of the mess Cheney/Bush created - and profited from in untold amounts - requires MORE resources than the "war" did! So yes, Obama sadly has the responsibility of ensuring that the powder keg Cheney/Bush lit and then ran and hid from doesn't blow up in our faces.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

3:57 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

At the time of President Obama's inauguration, Mass. unemployment was 7.10%, and today it is 6.10%.
(http://ycharts.com/indicators/massachusetts_unemployment_rate).

Harboring terrorists has never been considered an AMERICAN reason for bombing a place. We didn't bomb Canada, despite Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle's recent claim that the 911 attackers came from Canada. (http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/10/18/another-u-s-politician-says-911-terrorists-came-from-canada/). (The claim is false, by the way, just like the Bush Administration's claims of having identified weapons of mass destruction. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/mar/18/usa.iraq). We didn't bomb Michigan, or Texas, though they harbored Timothy McVeigh. President Clinton showed great restraint, I'm sure you agree. Remember Timothy McVeigh? Who wrote a letter to the Federal Government: "Go ahead, take everything I own; take my dignity. Feel good as you grow fat and rich at my expense; sucking my tax dollars and property."

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Brenda,

I respect your opinion. Mine is different. I even acknowleged that fact the Patrick faced different circumstance than Romney did when he too office. I can even admit the Patrick has gotten better as he went along! Except for the Tim Murray fiasco!
As far as Bush and Iraq goes, he had to do what his advisors told him to do. I agree he got bad advice at that time. I don't like the US dictating our policies to other countries any more than you. As far as Bush Sr. is concerned, he actually ended Desert Storm early to save lives, against the advice of his advisors.
Afghanistan was a terrorist training center! The Taliban needed to go, but as far as what has happened since??? Why are we still there? Why didn't Bush have an exit strategy? For that matter...What was Kerry's...or McCain's...or Obama's.
Politics is a galvanizing subject that gets all our emotions fired up! We all want our "Guy" (or Girl someday) to win. The best Presidents since I have been alive are Reagan and Clinton. There a Republican who liked Bill Clinton....who'da thunk?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

7:03 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Once again, Brenda, I like the way you think! And express yourself.

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Created Recovery.gov: Web site run by independent board of inspectors general looking for fraud and abuse in stimulus spending, provides public with detailed information on every contract funded by $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Thanks partly to this transparency, board has uncovered very little fraud, and Web site has become national model: “The stimulus has done more to promote transparency at almost all levels of government than any piece of legislation in recent memory,” reports Governing magazine.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Pushed Broadband Coverage: Proposed and obtained in 2011 Federal Communications Commission approval for a shift of $8 billion in subsidies away from landlines and toward broadband Internet for lower-income rural families.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Expanded Health Coverage for Children: Signed 2009 Children’s Health Insurance Authorization Act, which allows the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to cover health care for 4 million more children, paid for by a tax increase on tobacco products.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Recognized the Dangers of Carbon Dioxide: In 2009, EPA declared carbon dioxide a pollutant, allowing the agency to regulate its production.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Expanded Stem Cell Research: In 2009, eliminated the Bush-era restrictions on embryonic stem cell research, which shows promise in treating spinal injuries, among many other areas.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Provided Payment to Wronged Minority Farmers: In 2009, signed Claims Resolution Act, which provided $4.6 billion in funding for a legal settlement with black and Native American farmers who the government cheated out of loans and natural resource royalties in years past.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Helped South Sudan Declare Independence: Helped South Sudan Declare Independence: Appointed two envoys to Sudan and personally attended a special UN meeting on the area. Through U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, helped negotiate a peaceful split in 2011.

Reply

Al L

6:31 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Obama Killed the F-22: In 2009, ended further purchases of Lockheed Martin single-seat, twin-engine, fighter aircraft, which cost $358 million apiece. Though the military had 187 built, the plane has never flown a single combat mission. Eliminating it saved $4 billion.

Reply

Chris L.

9:45 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Hey Patch:

Has Obama purchased time here on the site? Or is Al L just angling for a cabinet post?

Reply

David Nolta

9:57 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

You should read him, Chris. All you do is fling your junior high school names and jibes. Step up, and READ for once. And respond intelligently, to the specific arguments. "Lieawatha!" "Mayor Mumbles!" God forbid you should ever make an original or helpful contribution...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris L.

2:44 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

I'm sorry, I didn't go 15 posts deep into an Obama platform flyer like your good friend Al over here.

Let's face it, David. You're an elitist. Not exactly sure why. You seem to feel superior to people. You're an internet tough guy. "junior high" "try READING"

Guess what? I make 6 figures as middle management in IT. I don't even have my degree yet. I GAVE something to this country. I served 12 years in the US Navy. And 6 years of that was BEFORE 9/11. So I didn't come home with my hand out, begging for the government to do this or that for me. If I had, I would be in school full time, with no job right now. Instead, I do BOTH full time.

All so internet tough guys like you can judge me...because YOU don't like how I think. I find it very amusing that the Democrats, the party of inclusion, lose their MINDS when they run across someone who doesn't believe that every person in America who has made bad life choices deserves a hug and an extra 2% of my paycheck.

Other than pound the keys on your macbook while sitting in Starbucks(so everyone can surmise that you're important), what do YOU contribute to society?

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris L - Thank you for your service, and thank you for the example you set to show what can be accomplished if you work hard.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

3:24 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

And you've watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. And you've got oil wells in Bakersfield, pumping, pumping. Congratulations, Chris L., on winning a game nobody else seems to be playing.

Again, not that we're here to spew the details of our lives, I don't drink coffee. Still, I'm charmed that you imagine me.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris, I know how you feel. Not sure why the government and I will include both parties, wants people to be dependant on it. How about telling the people on the welfare rolls to het up, get out and work. I bust it everyday, my wife is in IT as well and she busts it to. I'm tired of my tax dollars going to people who don't work, but have every cable channel. Is that right? Is this ok to all the democrats? I mean its your tax dollars to right? What's the Obama viewpoint on this? Does anyone know? Is really like to here it. Because here in Massachusetts its ok for people to use their EBT cards to buy booze and cigs.

Comment_arrow

UglyHat

3:52 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris L.,

The fact that you don’t have your hand out and that you’re not afraid to work for a living is a helpful contribution. And I can appreciate how difficult it is to keep an IT job in America today. Without original and helpful contributions, that job would surely belong to someone else. And military service to boot?

Honesty, civil service, experience and work ethic still mean something. Reading something worthwhile is good. Doing something worthwhile is better. Keep it up. There are plenty of us who agree with you.

Thank you!

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

5:19 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Oh David N, if you don't want to be pigeon-holed in life, don't put so many details out there.

I know if I lived in a neighborhood where illegal immigrants assaulted me, stole my camera, and left used condoms in my trees, I'd probably NOT be a Democrat anymore.

But hey, if you want the guy across the street to have nice things thank to his EBT card and STILL have the nerve to steal from you....vote Obama. And then you can vote for Cadillac in 2016.

Let's just open the borders on up. Immunity from DUIs for everyone(that's here illegally).

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:27 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris L. -- You've finally lost me--and I feel strangely relieved. I have no idea as to whether or not the condoms were left by illegals--I'm GLAD to say I didn't get too close (a biohazard is a biohazard). My camera was instantly returned--thanks to the Milford Police Department (who have a union, I believe). Don't laugh--I don't know what an EBT is. I'll look into it, and if you're nice (nicer than you have been up to now), I MAY get back to you. And Democrat or Republican, there's a little criminal in everybody, I believe. And most of the details about me, YOU provide. And they're not accurate. What's an elitist to do?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

7:09 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

By the way, Chris L., excuse my vanity, but what did you think of the style in that piece? Be kind! I had to cut it down from 2700 to 800 words. That's work, too, you know.

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

7:54 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

So you're saying you post false information about yourself in other publications, such as MWDN, or even when you're hawking your art novel? With your educational pedigree, Michigan, U. Chicago, and Yale, you should probably be firmly ensconced in the Republican way of thinking at this point in your life.

Or are you experiencing the typical MA Democrat White Guilt?

Could you explain that line of thinking to me? I am more of the philosophical bent that what I work for is mine, and I have no intention of sharing any more than I have to. If I recall, the "American Dream" used to entail showing up here with nothing, working hard, and making your own way in the world. When did it become "show up unannounced and undocumented, and get lavished with benefits to sit at home all day?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:08 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris L., Yep, you've lost me. I did not post false information about myself, here or elsewhere, and I resent your continually lying about me and saying that I did. And what in the heck is an "art novel"? Something tells me you aren't the person to ask. READ, before you accuse. I know you were in the service, and I know you have a great job, but that's not an excuse for lying, much less for lying over and over again. And by the way, despite your efforts, WE are not the subject here.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:31 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

And insulting people from behind a mask is a little cowardly, wouldn't you say? I support the use of an alias or pseudonym, but not when it is to cover cowardly, dishonest attacks on people, such as your own.

Al L

10:11 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Mitt Romney's new campaign manager..Another secret , surprise even gives Clint Eastwood a ride for his money.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaezjE1uJTw

Reply

David Nolta

10:10 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

And let's be honest, Chris L., YOU got personal this time.

Reply

Chris L.

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

David, your picture tells me everything I need to know. If you don't want to be prejudged, take down the "I was rejected as George Costanza" headshot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:03 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Miss/Mr./Mrs./Ms. Chris L.-- I wasn't tricked into using my real name, nor into posting my picture. These were deliberate indications of trust--trust that I would be participating with other trustworthy and similarly well-intentioned adults in serious, enlightening conversations. If others choose not to use their real or complete names--that's no problem for me; I have even defended the practice. But when those people hide behind their false or incomplete names--when they root into other people's personal lives (I don't have a huge problem with that, though it might seem a little pathetic) and then when they misreport, and distort, and persist in false accusations (I have a problem with that--wouldn't you?), they display truer selves than any photograph. Really, you don't like my looks? It's a blog about the RNC... For all your rather creepy digging, I might just as well be anyone else you don't know at all. And remember, Chris L., we've seen more of you here than you've seen of anyone or anything. And though the gender is not discernible (you're squatting behind a cardboard rock, after all), the white stripe is a mile long.

PS And that photo was taken several years ago. I am now the spitting image of the third Earl of Dorset, in the well-known portrait by William Larkin. Everybody says so.

Dave Lenane

2:30 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Housing costs highest level in six years. According to Forbes magazine unemployment at 11 percent. I am not saying Romney will cure all that ails the United States. I'm saying he deserves a chance . Barack had his and fumbled...that's my opinion. Of course all u dems will slam me for it...I don't care. Have at it! I

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris L.

2:44 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Obama HAD to get healthcare passed. Since he didn't put enough people back to work, he at least had to get them medical coverage.

Way to work around the REAL problem, Barry. Those of us who still have jobs greatly appreciate bearing the burden.

And for those who say Obama WON'T tax the middle class....what did the Solicitor General dub the "I don't have health care penalty" in front of SCOTUS?

I do believe he labeled it.....a TAX.

Obama already HAS taxed the middle class. Wake up!!!!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

3:52 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

So housing costs were higher seven years ago? Is that what you're saying?

Obama is succeeding, despite the slamming that you do.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:56 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Am I the only person here who is positively in favor of being taxed?--for the greater glory of the country? For the roads and the libraries and the military and the schools and the bridges--not to mention for the elderly and the handicapped and the underfed and the desperate? Bring it on! I am over that fear, and it's a wonderful place to be. I recommend it.

Dave Lenane

4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Dave N...I asked for the National unemployment numbers when Bush left office. And what they are currently. When Romney left office in Massachusetts the unemployment rate was 4.7% it is now 6.1%. Still below the National average of 11%...8.3% is not the actual rate. To be fair to Obama and Patrick the numbers are never what they say they are. But in both cases nationally and locally the Republicans did a bit better. Patrick even admitted that on MSNBC in May of this year. Again I will try to have an intelligent conversation with you because I don't believe you are as angry as u seem. I take offense to your "honest Americans will vote Obama" approach. I will listen to Obama tomorrow night. It probably won't make me vote for him...but miracles happen everyday!

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:24 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

I can't stay mad at you, Dave Lenane! I tried--I can't do it! I believe you're honest, and I hope I am too, and if we vote for different people, that's perfectly acceptable to me. And I hope we all survive and flourish, whatever happens.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lenane

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

David...I dont want you to be mad at me. Just remember that both these guys are politicians. I think that they are both probably good men. It would be fascinating to have a private conversation with either! I come off as wicked anti-Obama...I'm not really! I voted for him last election. I didnt want Palin anywhere near the White House. I just like Romney..and while we are being honest...his speech was at best OK. It was better in the middle than at the end. And from what I have read there were a lot of liberties taken with the facts.
NBC criticized Obama on the housing figures last night...LOL...not even really sure why thats all his fault. But the news is slanted...

Linda Worthy

4:38 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris,
The only part of the ACA that is a tax, is the penalty people pay when they do not get insurance. This same tax exists in Romneycare. We had to get health insurance passed because costs needed to be controlled and, very importantly, 30 million Americans did not have & could not get, health insurance. Thus Emergency Rooms became the first point of treatment.

As a result of ACA, people, including the folks who want to rail against ACA, can no longer be turned down by an insurance company due to a pre-existing condition. (That is huge). Also, people can stay on their parents' heath plan until age 26, if they so choose. This is great because many folks in their 20's were not getting health insurance and therefore any treatment they needed was more expensive. ACA is based on Romneycare which is based on the Republican-controlled Heritage Foundation recommendations of the 1990's.

ACA sets a limit of 20% of premiums that a health care provider can spend on administrative costs, sales and salaries. Furthermore, ACA gives the states the authority to lower that percentage; Massachusetts lowered it to 12%. If an insurance company spends more than the allotted percentage, they must rebate the overage to the folks who paid the premiums.
We, as a nation, are better off today because of ACA.

Reply
Comment_arrow

UglyHat

4:56 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda,

There is the mandate, which was a tax, then it wasn’t, now it is again.
There is a Medicare tax on high-income earners.
There is the Cadillac Health Plan tax
A cap on flexible spend plans, which increases taxable income.
A higher threshold on medical deductions, which increases taxable income.
A tanning booth tax.
A tax on medical devices, which will be passed down, and eventually paid by the patient.

I believe there are others but can’t think of them at the moment. Regardless, your statement is absolutely false.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:37 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Tanning is dangerous! I'm just saying...

Comment_arrow

UglyHat

8:43 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

True enough. But riding a bike in the city is dangerous too. Let's hope they don't tax that to fund the ACA.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:08 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

But wouldn't that be sensible, if you think about it? Seriously.

Comment_arrow

UglyHat

9:34 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

No, it wouldn’t be sensible at all. So you’re saying that anything that is deemed to be dangerous should be taxed? Wow! And who gets the power to deem something as dangerous? And at what rate should dangerous things be taxed?

Skiing, surfing, rock climbing, jogging, construction jobs, typing on a keyboard, not doing anything at all and becoming obese. Tax them all, right David.

Sounds to me like to have a deep disdain for freedom. What I do is and should remain my business and specifically not your business.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

10:00 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Nope, you begin well--logically--UglyHat, and then you go straight off the chart. You never suspect that someone else might have another mode of expression, or another angle of entry into a problem. I respect your sang-froid, and, though you find it hard to believe (which says more about you, I think, than about me), I share your love of individual freedom. And though I am not so afraid of or or averse to being taxed as you, I am not in love with the prospect of being taxed to death. But I think, speculatively, that taxing people based on their activities is not such a bad idea, once you admit (as I do--and presumably you accept SOME taxation as necessary: for schools, roads, things we share), that activities that represent risks to health, for example, might be taxed in such a way that those who enjoy those activities might ALL benefit by the care provided by the tax when those things go wrong. What is car insurance, after all? Driving (especially in Massachusetts) is a dangerous activity. Who handles it--private sector or government--doesn't really matter to me, so long as they're honest, and it's regulated better than the emergency provisions after Hurricane Katrina. And finally, why do you always sound so MEAN, suggesting that I am interested in what YOU do? I can assure you I am not. Ski, wind surf, become obese as your inclinations guide you (I hope you don't--but I'm sentimental). Just acknowledge that we are SHARING the world, and the overlap is important, too.

Comment_arrow

UglyHat

8:40 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

I don’t know why I sound mean to you David. Maybe your skin is a little too thin. I would understand if you thought I sounded angry – because I was angry at your last post. It angers me when you attempt to take away my freedom.

You and I disagree on many things. But the way you so cavalierly propose to take money from me to spend on things you think are right, or good or beneficial to all makes me angry. I share plenty. I love family and friends. I give to charity and help people in need, and I work hard to do these things and still provide for my family.

I do not appreciate being told it’s not enough when I know there are so many that do so much less, and when there are so many more that are eager to take when they don’t need, and when there is so much fraud and abuse, but nobody cares enough to do anything about it. They just take more from the taxpayers because it’s easier than fixing the problem.

I disagree that you appreciate individual freedom David. I don’t think you appreciate the individuality of anything. I think you are all about community. “We” can do it, instead of “I” can do it. There is a place for community, but individual freedom is more important to me. Please stop trying to take it from me.

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

11:37 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

UglyHat - I think you hit the nail squarely on the head!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

11:39 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Doubtless you are honest, UglyHat, when you say you are angry. Much of what you post seems colored by anger. But why do you continue to take both sides of the argument, claiming I "said" things that I did not say, and denying others the right to indulge in the sort of sarcasm or speculation or exaggeration which you use (right here, on this very Patch, in the past 24 hours for example!) as an excuse for making your more provocative or aggressive statements? And accusing, accusing, accusing. Anger--I get it.

But contrary to your unfounded claims, I do not want your money, and I do appreciate, and am as much a product of, individual freedom as yourself. And I am also--miraculously, at the same time--someone who believes in the "we" as much as the "I".

Congratulations on giving to charity; you might start showing a bit of it here. Though I am not cavalierly insisting on that.

Linda Worthy

5:19 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

David...David...David.
A little fact checking would prevent such untrue statements as:

"Because here in Massachusetts its ok for people to use their EBT cards to buy booze and cigs."

"Customers cannot use SNAP food stamps (EBT Cards) to buy non-food items like alcoholic beverages, cigarettes, vitamins or medicines, pet foods, soap, cosmetics, laundry products, paper goods, or other household products."
http://www.massresources.org/snap-store-owners-guide.html#whatfoods

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris L.

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda...Linda....Linda....

Now you sound as clueless as our(although I didn't vote for him) Governor. All of these stories of rampant abuse? Just "anecdotes" right? The people getting hit by drunk driving illegal immigrants? They're obviously faking the whole thing to further their xenophobic agenda. The drug dealer calling his woman from the police station to grab his EBT card to use for bail money? HA! The only people that overheard the conversation were cops. They certainly can't be trusted, right Linda? What's stopping these people from using the EBT card at ATM machines? or at crooked stores that allow EBT fraud? (here's a hint, read the Herald, the Globe would never print a negative article about Deval or Barry).

Concerned Citizen

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Chris L.,
Thank you for your service to our country. Your posts are always spot on!

Reply

FindBalance

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda - But in MA, you can get cash with your EBT card, then go buy the booze and cigs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Worthy

12:53 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

I can't find anywhere on line that reveals how much is put on an EBT card for a family of four or five or six. Nor can I find what percentage of that total can be converted to cash. Sounds like information we should have and perhaps the percentage that can be converted to cash needs to reduced.

David Nolta

6:25 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Linda--I am worried--who is this David you're referring to? I pray it isn't me, because I never said those things. AWKWARD!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Worthy

6:42 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Mr. Nolta -- scroll up to:

Dave Lenane 4:21 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

6:45 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Am I relieved!!! Thanks Linda, I wouldn't willingly diverge from you!

David Nolta

6:29 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

I can RARELY claim a really good idea, but I've had one now. We should form a "coalition of the furious". Bi-partisan, of course. And lots of drinking, I hope.

Reply

Dave Lenane

7:54 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Amazing how some people get fired up...and 50% of this country wont even vote!

Reply

Linda Worthy

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Even though it was messy as hell, I'm glad Obama showed his strength & got 'God' and 'Jerusalem' into platform. Romney doesn't have the strength to get his own views on abortion into the Repub platform.

Gotta go run a marathon now -- I'll be back in under 3 hours.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Kane

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

What does it say about a party when you have to "show strength" in order to get the word "God" into the platform, just anywhere!! And how do you think our Israeli allies feel when they are an afterthought??!! Says a lot about the party, doesn't it??!! How sad.......

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

2:35 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Linda - More likely a political calculation than strength.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:05 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Find Balance--you don't look for it, so you can't find it. Just admit you're prejudiced and stop pretending to be open-minded. The Republicans, despite their crass, offensive, unending babble, have no more handle on "God" than anybody else.

I get in trouble whenever I ask it, so here goes again: Have you seen the four-hour PBS special on Mormons? Fascinating.

Now ... Spin!

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

12:53 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Typical David, just devolve your arguments into personal attacks. No spin needed.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:49 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

Find Balance doesn't make personal attacks. Discuss.

Jake Tanner

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Obama's priorities are not My priorities, not my family's priorities , not my friends' priorities, not my church's priorities. Obama's values are not America's values or more importantly not my Founding Fathers' values.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jonah Vaughn

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Would love to know how Romney's values are the "Founding Father's" values. When he was pro-choice, pro universal healthcare, and currently a man without a plan, trust me I'll give you my plan after elected, is that what your view of the Founding Father's values were? He is further away from that group than any candidate I've ever seen.

The Founding Fathers were a pioneering group on a mission to escape control and the church. Referencing god was not an implication that the church should be involved in government. Rather, god was one of the guiding principles just like arming a militia and developing a tax code.

Keeping hating Obama - that's the beauty of this country.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:01 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

And the Founding Fathers--they have communicated with you directly? And is this a coincidence--the fact that your friends and family don't share President Obama's fight for the middle and lower classes? And Mr. Romney, the Mormon (you mentioned your church) flip-flopper, seems to share a great many of the priorities of our Founding Fathers? Good luck with that. Who was it who said that a large percentage of Americans, for religious reasons but also because they lack any understanding of the basic facts of economics, are regularly persuaded to vote against their own best interests?

Concerned Citizen

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

It is easy for white-collar professionals to be pro illegal immigration. They don't have to worry that an illegal immigrant is going to take their job. They are not the house painters, landscapers, carpenters, brick and stone masons, house cleaners, janitors, etc., whose jobs are being undercut and/or taken by illegal immigrants. Those used to be good paying jobs that middle class Americans supported families on. I know, I grew up in one of those families.
It is for this reason that so many AFL-CIO members in construction support Scott Brown. They are tired of seeing illegal immigrants taking their jobs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:32 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

And these people you are concerned about? Who overlooks them, and gives their jobs to illegal immigrants (if that scenario is indeed true; it is certainly credible to some extent)? Not other bricklayers and janitors, nor most middle class people--who can't afford to, in any sense of the term. Let's see, who benefits by the presence of an underpaid, immigrant work force? Who is able to drive down American wages with this threat? Not you or me. It is, once again, the small percentage of very wealthy Americans who benefit--the "class" to which Mr. Romney belongs, and whose priorities are his only area of expertise and concern. Good luck.

Comment_arrow

Linda Worthy

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Agribusiness and meat processing plants gave illegal immigrants lots of jobs. But jobs in your town such as house painters, landscapers, carpenters, bricklayers, restaurant help and house cleaners were given to illegal immigrants by our friends and neighbors, some of whom run small businesses, others of whom wanted a cheaper price to have their roof shingled. And a lot of us grew up in the families to which you refer. But aside from you making a general statement, just what is it that Mr. Brown has done or plans to do about this?

Comment_arrow

Mom's for Mitt

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Has anyone seen the documentary "They come to America?" Dennis Michael Lynch put this out. He's not political at all & kind of fell upon this project. I was so intrigued by an interview that I paid the $20 or so to have it sent out to me. Well done...worth every penny! This was supposed to be played in theatres, but at the last minute...they backed out on him. Wonder why??? Anyway...what he's offering is if you order the DVD, he'll send you 3 DVDs asking you to pass them on so the word gets out on the seriousness of illegals in this country. www.theycometoamerica.com

I know what you're talking about "Concerned Citizen"...my husband is in construction. Works even harder than he did before, makes less $$ & has to travel further. And with those gas prices, cost for tolls, all the insurances & Massachusetts BS...I ask myself everyday if it's worth it to be in that business anymore. It's sad!!

Concerned Citizen

1:44 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Remember the old saying, "Charity begins at home."

Reply

Al L

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

No President – not me or any of my predecessors could have repaired all the damage in just four years. ~ Bill Clinton

Reply
Comment_arrow

FindBalance

2:05 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

I did not have s_x with that woman, Ms Lewinsky ~ Bill Clinton (while wagging finger at the American people)

I disagree - we should be in much better shape than we are at this point in the "recovery" (if that's what you want to call it).

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:27 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

I believe that FB never had sex with Monica Lewinsky. Next.

Comment_arrow

Mom's for Mitt

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Total BS. My best friend is a liberal & loves Bill Clinton. I don't get it!!! He's the biggest womanizer out there! Rape, sexual harassment, taking advantage of a 21 yr old intern (who's young life was ruined because of him)...come on! He's a dirt bag! Remember...he was impeached!! But liberals still love him...what does that say about them?

Not me or any of my predecessors could have repaired... How about taking the blame for starting all of it. Who signed off on the Community Reinvestment Act? Look it up.

David Nolta

9:33 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Yes, but it branches out, if it's real.

Reply
Comment_arrow

FindBalance

2:35 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

It branches out of your own free will, not a govt mandate

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:36 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Yes, FB, let it branch out. We are the government, and we take care of our own. Aren't you proud to be part of the greatest, most civilized, most humane society in the history of the WORLD? Where FB is a small, but vital, part of something bigger than FB??? I am.

Comment_arrow

FindBalance

11:37 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

When the govt gets too powerful, which is the direction in which we are headed, then "we" are no longer the govt.

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:51 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

We are the government. We cannot be "too powerful."

Concerned Citizen

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

If you are a house painter who can't afford to do a job as cheaply as an illegal immigrant, because you are paying more in insurance and taxes, then you are indeed losing jobs to illegal immigrants, which impacts your income greatly. Over time, it lowers the good paying wages that you once had. How does that benefit the middle class?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda Worthy

12:53 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

If, as the consumer, you chose to hire the illegal immigrant just to save money on having your house painted or roof shingled, you are the one who caused the legal, American worker to lose jobs and lowered his good paying wages. Three yrs. ago, I fired a contractor in mid-job when he brought an illegal worker to my property after being expressly told not to do so. Yeah, it cost me more money in the long run, but my money did not go to support an illegal worker and did not contribute to lowering good paying wages.

HyeAghcheg

12:34 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Chris L - "If I recall, the "American Dream" used to entail showing up here with nothing, working hard, and making your own way in the world. When did it become "show up unannounced and undocumented, and get lavished with benefits to sit at home all day?""

Very well said. I'm first generation American and my parents & grandparents came without anything. They all achieved middle class status during their lifetime and the grandchildren have gone on to achieve more. None of us were born into money, but with student loans and part-time jobs, we've gotten ourselves educated. I'm tired of listening to the Dems talk about class warfare, unlevel playing fields, etc. Of course the wealthy are born into advantage, but a person can work their way out of poverty, if they put their mind to it. Society needs to stop handing out entitlements, as that's not what this country was founded upon. We do have equal opportunities...which is something that's difficult to find in other nations!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris L.

4:07 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Its wonderful to hear the heartwarming tales of Democratic part leaders who have been "like us" and worked their way up. How Liz Warren played the race card, and rode her Cherokee heritage all the way to a run for US Senate, but couldn't find the time to sit with "her people" during the convention.

Or how Barrack Obama TOTALLY didn't get into Harvard, Columbia, OR U. Chicago based on his ethnicity or socioeconomic status.

Such a fine and upstanding group of people whose work ethic should be admired. If they didn't have the nerve to check other boxes on the ethic group column...who knows, they may have had to get JOBS!!!!

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

9:00 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Chris L., You got the vote. You got a six-figure salary. What in the heck are you griping about?

And by the way, you don't think that people formerly abused by OUR government should be given a little consideration? You go on about "white guilt". But you benefit by yellow guilt, no? Count your blessings. And think about getting a degree.

Comment_arrow

Chris L.

11:37 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

David,

Your concern for my future is heartwarming. I feel special, like you're looking after me.

Fortunately though, I'm not waiting around for handouts, or for some life coach to come along and tell me what I need to do. I am in the midst of using my GI Bill(government money? yes. but also a part of a contract that I lived up to on my end) to finish my Bachelor's Degree. I'll be done in less than 2 years.

What brand of guilt are you getting by on? I'm sure someone in your genetic line was abused by another group, therefor you probably feel you get special status in some people's eyes today.

Also, until Warren PROVES she's Native American, doesn't it just sound a little dirty of her to keep checking that box on her forms? You don't really believe she received NO benefit, do you? No one looked at her resume or application just ONE MORE TIME because she checked that box?

How naive do you (and her) think we all are?

Comment_arrow

David Nolta

8:53 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

You mean that contract that began with FDR? Good for you, Chris L., whoever or whatever you may be.

HyeAghcheg

2:05 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

"No President – not me or any of my predecessors could have repaired all the damage in just four years. ~ Bill Clinton"

I don't think anyone expected all the financial problems solved in four years, but we did expect SOME progress to be made in that time frame. Unemployment has been over 8% for 42 mos. and real unemployment (those not collecting or those underemployed) exceeds 15%. Those numbers should have been dropping bit by bit over the last couple of years, but they're not. People are still getting laid off by the hundreds of thousands every month.

Reply

Al L

3:04 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Ladies and gentlemen our 45th President of the United States, put your hands together for Mitt Romney !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaezjE1uJTw

Reply

Al L

4:07 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

(question) "Has anyone seen my tax returns ?? Somebody stole them and just when I was going to show them to everyone".....(answer) "I think Trump stole them Mitt, check under his hairpiece."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mom's for Mitt

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I just wish Mitt would say "I'll give you MORE tax returns when you hand over your college transcripts." Fair?

If Mitts taxes are such a big deal then it needs to added to the job employment form for president how many years of taxes that need to be submitted. They're grasping...

Linda Worthy

8:44 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

"People are still getting laid off by the hundreds of thousands every month."
What is your source on this statistic, HyeAghcheg?

"Unemployment has been over 8% for 42 mos. "
Unemployment has been over 7% for 42 mos.
Unemployment has been over 6% for 42 mos.
Unemployment has been over 5% for 42 mos.
Exactly what number would have satisfied you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

9:45 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

I posted a link to the Dept. of Labor web site page. Please take the time to read their articles: http://www.dol.gov/

HyeAghcheg

8:44 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Al Linane also commented on SOUND OFF: Romney and the RNC.

"Obama:Passed the Stimulus: Signed $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009 to spur economic growth amid greatest recession since the Great Depression. Weeks after stimulus went into effect, unemployment claims began to subside. Twelve months later, the private sector began producing more jobs than it was losing, and it has continued to do so for twenty-three straight months, creating a total of nearly 3.7 million new private-sector jobs."

Nice spin. Too bad 3.5 years have passed and 365,000 people filed new claims for unemployment just last week. BTW, that number was a decrease of 12,000 people from the week before. Is that your definition of success? Almost four years later and we're still bleeding jobs at an unacceptable pace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

12:54 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

To Al L: You are aware that the U.S. government outsources jobs to China, as well, right?

HyeAghcheg

9:45 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

For the latest financial statistics, click on this link and scroll down to the lower left hand corner of the page. It provides the latest unemployment claims filed and the most recent national unemployment rate:

http://www.dol.gov/

Reply

Dave Lenane

11:37 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Here's a great article in today's Boston Herald that point out the deficiencies in BOTH candidates. The Labor Department reports on the unemployment numbers this morning. And for all the Bush slamming that goes on....and some of it deserved...it's worth noting that under Bush the unemployment rate was NEVER higher than 6.3% (Which is still too high). Maybe we should nominate a third candidate?

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/general/view.bg?&articleid=1061158535&format=&page=1&listingType=nat#articleFull

Reply

Dave Lenane

11:37 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Good thing Mr. Obama gave his speech last night. This mornings jobs report sure would have put a damper on things! Unemployment fell because more people gave up looking for work according to Boston.com. That's great more people for the people who do work to support! Exactly how is the Democratic plan "working" again?

Reply

Linda Worthy

12:08 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

CBS has reported that they have sold 90% of the ad time for 2013 Super Bowl with 30 second spots going for $3.8 million. Seems like a bunch of companies are betting on -- not against -- America.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al L

9:12 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Everyone is so on edge nowadays, People need to lighten up and enjoy the surroundings and realize there's more to life than politics. Don't you think?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN-woJ3pzAI

Concerned Citizen

12:53 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

If Elizabeth Warren is as smart as the Democrats say she is, why didn't she get the legal documentation proving that she had Cherokee ancestry before she checked the minority boxes at UPenn and Harvard? Isn't that what they teach in law school?
Either Elizabeth Warren isn't very smart or she's intellectually dishonest.

Reply

HyeAghcheg

2:57 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

"CBS has reported that they have sold 90% of the ad time for 2013 Super Bowl with 30 second spots going for $3.8 million. Seems like a bunch of companies are betting on -- not against -- America."

How is that relevant to the economy? Corporate America will always have the money to fund advertising for the Super Bowl. That will not, however, benefit the millions of people that are out of work.

Reply

Joe Kane

4:00 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

HyeAghcheg - Linda doesn't know much about Advertising. You go out and spend money and advertise in order to generate sales of your products. If the orders are coming through the doors faster than you can fill them, you can cut back on your advertising budget. If the sales are not up to your levels of expectation, then you need to seek them out through advertising. If the economy was doing real good, the need to spend money on Super Bowl commercials would be left to those whose entire advertising campaigns are designed for big-viewing audiences, such as the Super Bowl. But given how the economy is not doing well, it will be interesting to see who feels that exposure to such a huge audience during the Super Bowl will generate the business that they either need or want.

Reply

Dave Lenane

5:13 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

I'm really not sure what advertising has to do with the lousy job stats that came out today. I guess the Democrats are trying to make us look away by mentioning the Superbowl! With Obama's pleading for 4 more years last night, and today's numbers, no way does he get re-elected! I wanted him to at least give a good speech last night. Its good television! Bust his speech was at the very least "Eastwoodesque". How about Biden too? We killed Bin Laden, and we saved GM! Hey Joe...how about getting GM to pay us back? You know...we the middle class that you express to care so much about!
I know Dave Nolta is probably at work or with his family. And I hope to hear his opinion on this soon! But where are all the other Democrats today? Probably blaming the Republicans again. Or yelling the Democratic Rally Cry..."We can't fix this in 4 years....it was to broken and wrecked by Bush!" Umm...Reagan did it in less than 4 years...and he inherited a hell of a lot more mess than Mr. Obama. Oh and he did it with a Democratic House of Representatives for the first six years, and a COMPLETE Democratic Congress his last two. So don't say it cant be done. All of us should be mad that so little has been done by ALL our Reps to fix this mess! Don't put all the blame squarely on George Bush.

Reply

Concerned Citizen

12:13 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

A lot of the wealthy Americans who hire illegal immigrants as painters, stone masons, and house cleaners are citizens, such as Barney Frank, John Kerry, Elizabeth Warren, and Deval Patrick. You see, the Republicans do not have a monopoly on wealth. The Democrats like to pretend that they are ALL middle class, when in fact, they are pretty wealthy, too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HyeAghcheg

12:52 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Agreed. Most politicians are wealthy. That's why I find it very entertaining, when Democrats try to paint Republicans as out of touch, while they can totally relate to the poor and middle class. Nothing could be further from the truth, why can't people see that? And how can they be foolish enough to believe that, all wealthy people are evil? There's good and bad in every demographic group of people, regardless of race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation and income level.

Concerned Citizen

12:13 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I applaud Linda for firing a contractor who brought an illegal immigrant worker on her property after being told not to do so.

Reply

HyeAghcheg

10:16 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I wish both parties would get off the subject of birth certificates, college transcripts and tax returns. Why can't people see that those are all distractions? Look at past records of performance on the job. Nobody can foresee the future, but past performance is usually the best indicator of what's to come.

Reply

Al L

4:59 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Sheldon Adelson Stands To Get $2 Billion Tax Cut If Mitt Romney Is Elected.

Nice.

Reply

Leave a comment