Letter: Need for Senior Center Clouding Park Issue
In a letter to the editor, a Marlborough resident says the need for a new senior center is clouding the issue of losing land at Ward Park.
Editor's Note: This letter was sent to city officials as well as Marlborough Patch and was written by Resident Karen Maiocchi about the issue of a Senior Center at Ward Park.
This issue continues to be clouded by the overriding desire for a new senior center. The issue isn't whether the city could benefit from a new senior center, the issue is location, location, location. Any property owner knows that the value of any property either benefits or suffers based on location. The Ward Park Neighborhood Association is simply requesting that a new senior center be located in an appropriate location. The addition of a large two story building in Ward Park will directly effect property value in this area.
There are several possible locations including the large lot located the intersections of Lincoln and Mechanic Streets or adjacent to the 55+ housing development located off of Fitchburg Street behind the Assabet Valley High School football field. The city doesn't own those properties. If the Mayor is willing to justify the expenditure of 10 to 12 million dollars for a new center, he should be willing to purchase property if needed for the center to be located in the right location.
It is absurd to surmise that simply because the senior center would be located within Ward Park, seniors would be able to take advantage of the park. There is nothing preventing them from using the park now. The idea that the football cheerleaders could practice indoors in the new senior center is outrageous. Kids need to have the outdoor space to run and play and not be cooped up within four walls. Why take this away from the children of Marlborough?
The Mayor is attempting to hold the people of the city hostage by claiming that much needed improvements would take place in the park if a senior center was located there. How dare Mayor Vigeant, Councilors Pope and Elder attempt to bribe the residents of the city. The park does need attention. The homeowners in this area have approached the city numerous times requesting upgrades to the park's amenities. However, the only changes to the park have been the addition of a half pipe, a revamping of the playground, a baseball back stop and most recently an ice rink. While there were some safety concerns about the half pipe, the park has maintained a place for recreation for all ages. Which simply stated, is what the park is for.
The proposal of a senior center on only 3 percent of the land of Ward Park is extremely short sighted. The proposed footprint of the building is larger than the claimed 3%, the needed parking area is too small and access to the area via New Street is too dangerous for frequent traffic. The neighborhood streets are narrow and were never intended for through way travel. During the recent snow storms the streets were drivable as single lanes only. As a homeowner on Water Terrace I deserve to travel in safety and so do my neighbors. This area is small and compact with established homes on small lots. A drive around this area shows pride of home ownership. As a long time resident of this neighborhood, placing a senior center here will surely diminish the quality of live homeowner's here enjoy.
The mayor has an opportunity to do something great for the seniors who live here. Creating adversaries within the community is not the way to do it. The Ward Park Neighborhood Association may currently be small in number but, we will not be deterred. The old saying "you can't fight city hall" is just that, an old saying. As winter comes to an end, city hall can expect a fight. My intention is to become much more visible and much louder as I continue to oppose the proposed location.
Sincerely,
Karen Maiocchi
arnold
7:43 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
Where's an INDEPENDENT analysis of the Seniors NEEDS. One that is done not simply by the potential beneficiaries such as COA, Senior Center residents et al, but includes the folks who will have to bear the burden - you know those least represented participants - the TAXPAYERS.
The initial cost of a new building will pale in comparison to the untold millions that it will cost to maintain it plus all the attendant new costs like transportation, food, health care, nurses, activity directors, vehicles, new physical exercise equipment trainers, the list is endless.
The folks at the Senior center and their fellow recipients probably already have a list and the signs ready to bulldoze the councilors into submission.
Nancy Byrne
9:36 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
I for one will try and vote them all out in the next election if this goes thru!!!!!
resident
11:07 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
I wonder if Karen ever received a response to her letter from the city officials she sent it to? On February 19th my wife and I sent an email to the City Council. We wrote "We don't understand how a decision that so greatly alters Marlborough's history and so greatly affects future generations can be made without any public debate or input. Please take a second to explain that to us, we would be grateful". There has been no reply to our letter. On February 22nd I wrote to just Councilor Elder asking why, in light of a petition of 750 signers(www.savewardpark.com) there has been no more public meetings with the constituents?
It seems to me that if you are against taking away open play spaces from the children they are NOT interested in what you have to say. I for one am glad to see talk of voting them all out has begun.
Karen Maiocchi
6:47 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
As of now, I have not heard from any city officials. I will up date this post if and when I hear from city officials. Karen